NCIS

http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/20
10/02/02/blind-item-ausiello-h
it-show-feud/

While this is a blind item, it's pretty obvious what show they are referring to here....

Save NCIS; Ditch Shane Brennen

There shouldn't even be a question about how this goes. MH is the soul of NCIS. The show will not survive without him. Brennan needs to go focus on LA.

gee I thought they were talking about Private Practice and Greys??? still do..

There's something I don't like about these "blind items". It's like saying "I have such juicy news!!!! But I can't tell you. Sorry".

whoa....Idon'tthink it's blaringly obvious that it's NCIS, I doubt MH would start another feud after his one with Bellisario. The peopleon the site seem to have a bunch of other ideas, soI reckon we should all chill out about this

This sounds like NCIS, and if it is it has to be Shane Brennan spending all his time on the LA set. Shane should go if he is causing this many problems and CBS should support MH and the cast.

its' a muscle reflex.. they just assume it's NCIS... Greys has a spin off called Private Practice.. I don't watch the shows.. even the comments on Ausiello from fans that do seem to be aware that something isn't right over there.

I do agree, people are speculating because of the initial post. I don't know if it is the case or not of course (rolling eyes), but REALLY, i read all interviews of Mark and Brennan, and NOTHING came out like that. On the contrary, they praised collectively. People should just wait and see.

also Grey's had a lot of problems over the years with the cast... SB knows the history between DB and MH.. I would seriously doubt he would allow something like that to happen again.. just not good business sense..

Is Grey's considered a hit show? Just curious, I've never watched it. I sure hope it isn't NCIS. MH seemed real appreciative of the writers in his last interview...didn't recall him mentioning SB.

Greys is people's answer for everything, Shomda Rimes is vert involved in GA and PP. Plus, the show doesn't really have one clearly defined leading man, though I suppose McWhatshisname would count.

I read that Shonda Rimes twitted, tweeted (?) that it wasn't their show. Don't know if that matters.

Basically he is saying is that it is a show with a clearly defined leading man and a showrunner who is handling more than one project on a show where the network has had to intervene in the past to solve a dispute. Always assuming this isn't one of his fantasies are their any other shows these could apply to?

I hate blind items. Every time you have a blind item, you have comments from a bunch of folks who are absolutely certain that they know beyond the shadow of a doubt who it is referring to. And all these folks disagree with each other. So let's say for example that 20% of them guess the correct answer. That means that the other 80% are gossiping, spreading false infoand imagining trouble where there very well may not be any. Not a good thing. For the record, I too think that there is no show without Mark Harmon. But, I am not giving any validity to this rumor until the "source" has the guts to come out and identify themselves.

gailluvstony wrote:

I hate blind items. Every time you have a blind item, you have comments from a bunch of folks who are absolutely certain that they know beyond the shadow of a doubt who it is referring to. And all these folks disagree with each other. So let's say for example that 20% of them guess the correct answer. That means that the other 80% are gossiping, spreading false infoand imagining trouble where there very well may not be any. Not a good thing. For the record, I too think that there is no show without Mark Harmon. But, I am not giving any validity to this rumor until the "source" has the guts to come out and identify themselves.

From what I remember of his 'spoilers' he's wrong more often than he is right. Whats his track record with these sort of things?