Survivor

nj10devils wrote:

I like it....a little more uncertainty......but to add another wrinkle to it, each of the final 3 should have to cast a vote for one of the other two....

I don't know about that that I think that if each of the people in the F3 were to have a vote they would just vote for the person they thought wouldn't get any votes,

With the F3 it is my understanding from one of the previous seasons that the F3 do cast a vote in case of the 3-3-1 tie (assuming 7 jurors). The vote for the person finishing 3rd (i.e. getting only 1 vote) would then decide the winner. This has never happened so we don't know for sure. But one of the final 3 from the China season said that this was the process. *BAND*

thewipf wrote:

keyanuesmom wrote: I think it should be 2 only. both times there were 3, one person got NO votes. How humilating for them.

Sugar not getting any votes really isn't humilating. She wasn't playing to win. If she had been playing to win she could have beat both Bob and Susie. All three of Susie's votes were votes against Bob and Sugar not votes for Susie.

Oh gosh, thank you for posting this. You just saved me from a whole 20 minutes of typing. When Sugar was at FTC, - she even helped Bob by propping up and nodding to his answers. So.. she was rooting for Bob, then? Duh.. thought she should be playing for herself. I'm so tired of hearing excuses for why Sugar didn't win, or the unfairness of it all. Sugar was responsible for Sugar's demise. Her age had nothing to do with it. She wasn't a victim of being tongue-tied, either like Amanda. And I'd liked her for the whole game.. until it became apparent she was only there to have fun and..? Well, I guess only Sugar knows this. Sugar's a major case of Recruiting gone wrong. When Bob was asked on the Early show who he was most scared of in the end, he said Matty, and Susie. I'm glad he thanked Sugar - but I would have killed for her spot (JJ) - Well it was an important spot! But you don't prop up the 'player' of your choice at FTC when you yourself have made it to FTC... As long as Sugar's happy, I suppose... don't think the players who thought she was playing to win and therefore bested them for this are, but glad BOB took it.

I didn't read any previous posts. It should have been Sugar and Bob, neck and neck. Susie should not have even factored into this. I don't think Sugar will suffer though. She will get many offers. She looked fantastic at the reunion show.I liked Susie. She just didn't deserve to be in the final three. Thank goodness she didn't win!

nj10devils wrote:

I like it....a little more uncertainty......but to add another wrinkle to it, each of the final 3 should have to cast a vote for one of the other two....

I don't know about that that I think that if each of the people in the F3 were to have a vote they would just vote for the person they thought wouldn't get any votes,

No, the vote of the NON-tied person would be used to bread the TIE. Your proposed strategy would be counter-productive, at best.

No, the vote of the NON-tied person would be used to bread the TIE. Your proposed strategy would be counter-productive, at best.

Yeah I get what your trying to say but I was replying to a post where somebody said that each of the people in the final 3 should get a normal jury vote (at least thats what I thought they were trying to say) and thats why I wrote that But I think what you were saying about the non-tied person's vote counting is a good idea

nj10devils wrote:

No, the vote of the NON-tied person would be used to bread the TIE. Your proposed strategy would be counter-productive, at best.

Yeah I get what your trying to say but I was replying to a post where somebody said that each of the people in the final 3 should get a normal jury vote (at least thats what I thought they were trying to say) and thats why I wrote that But I think what you were saying about the non-tied person's vote counting is a good idea

OK, thanks. And when you evetually see it happen, remember you heard it here, first!

Not a Fan of Final 3! Final 2 has more suspense and less drama queen comments from the Jury!

gruberk153 wrote: Not a Fan of Final 3! Final 2 has more suspense and less drama queen comments from the Jury!

I totally agree with you here! Why bring the useless 3rd strawdog along if they're just taking up valuable time, time away from a good Final TC.Carriekins

I thought I was the only one that hate final 3. Get Back to the orginal format. Much more hateful & fun that way.

I kinda like the final 3, but there is kinda no point in it, cus usually it comes down to the person who is most liked, the most person most hated, and then the third person is usually most like, but only got there riding the coat tails of either one of the two (i.e. Susie!!!) But im more upset about the fact that they don't have the car/truck giveaway that they used to have ever since they had the different races show! my favorite part about the Survivor series is when they give away the Chevy vehicles! Please Survivor! Bring back the vehicle prize!!!! It's soooo much fun to watch! You are my most favorite show to watch!!!!!

Survivor

Survivor Community Forum