Survivor

Charlie is going to need a shoulder to cry on when he finds out Marcus is gone-Corrine?Highly unlikely!

Why do people define playing a "bad game" as performing poorly in challenges? That's not even HALF of what makes a great player.As far as I'm concerned, anyone who's made it THIS far is SO FAR playing a good game. Everyone who has lasted this long has made various strategic decisions that have worked out.If Kenny and Crystal make it to the final three, I just don't understand how anyone can claim that they "didn't deserve" to be there. Whoever makes it to the final three has outwitted, outplayed and outlasted everyone else, regardless of how they managed to do so.

Why the fuck do you want the onions to have power? No...no...that doesn't settle right with me.

If Kenny and Crystal make it to the final three, I just don't understand how anyone can claim that they "didn't deserve" to be there. Whoever makes it to the final three has outwitted, outplayed and outlasted everyone else, regardless of how they managed to do so.

Why the fuck do you want the onions to have power? No...no...that doesn't settle right with me.

It wasn't a sure thing for Kota even before the fake merge. If they had merged when they thought they were gonna merge, Ken's alliance had 4 people, plus susie as a possible swing (and as we've seen, she's more than willing to jump) making it 5v5, and with Sugar's HLL, it's more than possible that they could have gotten the advantage and gotten ahead anyways. Ken seemed pretty eager for the merge, which means he had a plan, and it was most likely something along those lines.

Then why did they not stick to that plan,if Kota went down like that i could have accepted it better but i think your wrong.Kota was a unified team yea Susie proofed untrustworthy bud the rest would have stuck to the alliance i belief(atleast till all Fangmembers where gone),but Fang where a skattered group of people with tiny alliances that workted against each otherthis is also the biggest reason why they could not win a single challenge that and they had Crystal on there team Anyway we wil never know for sure now.I think this is something that repeats itself over and over again,one tribe chooses to kick there strong out and the other kicks there weak then the challenges become lobsided and production has to step in to prefent this,then the weak players who have formed alliances by then can just band together and vote out the strong again.The result is that the fysical strong don't stand a change ever.

well if the physically strong alliance couldn't outsmart or outplay the other alliance in terms of strategic moves then perhaps they don't deserve to win? If they were really so strong, another alternative will be to keep winning the Individual Immunity Challenges all the way to the final two/three. No one can take that away from you. (well, except Natalie )

I think different people have different skills and would like it if every1 can play to there skillset,thats why it would be better if about 85%to 90% of all challenges where fysical so at least one person that plays that game could make it to the final2-3 using only that skill(winning all immunity challenges).Lets say James from season 15-16 he is a nice guy but he could play this game 100 times and he would never get to the end because he dos not have the social cutthroat attitude other players may have,so for a player like that the challenges are a way to force himself to the end.I don't know just a idea.Has there ever been a fysical strong player in the final 2-3?

It is a typical example that Marcus, Charlie and the whole Korta tribe may be a strong team, but they are not smart player of Survivor.... Being on the top in all challenges make them forget to they are of high risk based on the number game. Losing the challenge just like PG in Survivor China is definitely the best shot to ensure their winner status in the game.