<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the topic "NICOLE STEINWEDELL "]]></title>
		<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/list/265.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the topic "NICOLE STEINWEDELL "]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>Does anyone know where Nicole is originally from? I know she is from a military family and I grew up with the Steinwedells and that Bob Steinwedell is in the military.  Wonder if she could be his daughter? It would be a small world!! I believe Bob moved to Texas and he remarried years ago and I know he has children. Thanks!! <img src="/forum/images/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" /></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/243759.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/243759.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 25 Sep 2008 21:46:39]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ leolion811]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>Her parents were both in the Marines. Check out the interview TV Guide did with her yesterday. <img src="/forum/images/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" />http://community.tvguide.com /blog - entry/TV-Show-Blog/Tv-Previews /Unit-Nic - le-Steinwedell/800047542 </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/248515.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/248515.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:08:14]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ roobaby45]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>Thank you! I will check it out! <img src="/forum/images/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" /></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/248750.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/248750.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 27 Sep 2008 15:19:48]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ leolion811]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>leolion811 wrote: </cite>Does anyone know where Nicole is originally from? I know she is from a military family and I grew up with the Steinwedells and that Bob Steinwedell is in the military.  Wonder if she could be his daughter? It would be a small world!! I believe Bob moved to Texas and he remarried years ago and I know he has children. Thanks!! <img src="/forum/images/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" /></div>		</blockquote> Who cares ? Sorry but adding her to the series is terrible, There are NO WOMEN in any Special forces and her interview was garbage . Bridgette needs an early demise or The Unit loses all its credibility <img src="/forum/images/smilies/1069449046bcd664c21db15b1dfedaee.gif"  />  I'm a woman viewer and resent TPTB trying to rewrite the series to become a typical soap opera and although I'll be watching the premiere I'll be the first nitpicking it apart too <img src="/forum/images/smilies/1069449046bcd664c21db15b1dfedaee.gif"  /> Not a fan of her bring on the series and find it all total crap ! </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/248951.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/248951.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 27 Sep 2008 16:53:37]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ wolflady123]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>To each his own opinion. <img src="/forum/images/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" /></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/249170.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/249170.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:05:16]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ leolion811]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>leolion811 wrote: </cite>To each his own opinion. <img src="/forum/images/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" /></div>		</blockquote> Yup and an opinion shared by many others who think TPTB are grasping at straws trying to see this kind of crap and make it work !! The Unit is about the special forces meaning the men on their missions and their wives keeping things together and this was the original concept for the series- now it is easily becoming a farce and extremely soapy which takes away from The Unit and what it all stands for ..  This interview came across as very fabricated and contrived <img src="/forum/images/smilies/1069449046bcd664c21db15b1dfedaee.gif"  /> Now it is more like GI JANE or the A-Team which is completely opposite of what The Unit's supposed to be <img src="/forum/images/smilies/2786c5c8e1a8be796fb2f726cca5a0fe.gif" /></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/249476.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/249476.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 27 Sep 2008 21:47:49]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ wolflady123]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>I haven't watched the show so I understand where you are coming from. I hope that it doesn't ruin the show. Thanks! <img src="/forum/images/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" /></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/249566.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/249566.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 27 Sep 2008 22:19:08]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ leolion811]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>I'm withholding judgement until I see exactly what she brings to the show. That said, I'm also keeping an open mind about the whole thing. I have confidence that the great writers will make her character credible in this new role. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/250258.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/250258.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 28 Sep 2008 10:24:32]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ bashfulwun]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>Sure do hope so! <img src="/forum/images/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" /></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/250574.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/250574.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 28 Sep 2008 13:56:12]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ leolion811]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>Yeah her introduction to the series was weak. have to see what they do with her to have the final verdict </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/251722.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/251722.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 28 Sep 2008 23:24:15]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ JGG65]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>I am not buying it, otherwise Natural Selection was bogus.  She can be in the Unit but she cannot be an operative without going through the selection process.  If they try that, then they have diminished the credibility of the show.Nyn </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/251734.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/251734.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 28 Sep 2008 23:26:45]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ nynaevelan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>nynaevelan wrote: </cite>I am not buying it, otherwise Natural Selection was bogus.  She can be in the Unit but she cannot be an operative without going through the selection process.  If they try that, then they have diminished the credibility of the show.Nyn </div>		</blockquote>agreed </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/251798.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/251798.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 29 Sep 2008 00:04:41]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ The_Wrangler]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>Well remember, THE UNIT is based on Delta Force (1st SFOD-D) .. and there have been rumors for years about a "funny platoon" that had females. Mostly for undercover civilian ops. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/251921.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/251921.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 29 Sep 2008 01:37:11]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ a45shooter]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>I agree with wolflady. I watched it and perhaps don't mind that she will be hanging out with the wives but I don't like here as part of The Unit. They are a tight knit group and just because she suggested it is not a good enough reason to add her. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/254422.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/254422.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 30 Sep 2008 00:11:10]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ kabalguy]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>who is this new girl???? i love that she can b glamorous and so down to earth . i hope we see a lot more of her! </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/272039.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/272039.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 7 Oct 2008 03:27:42]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ newfanu]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>where are her photos ? i can't find them. i hope they don't kill her off! </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/272041.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/272041.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 7 Oct 2008 03:30:24]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ newfanu]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>She is so beautiful!...Do you know for how many episodes she will be with the unit? For all the season?I don't fine anything about it </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/275199.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/275199.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 8 Oct 2008 09:49:02]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ aidenx]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>She'l be on for at least the next 3 or 4, I think. She's a Guest Star. Not a series regular. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/275530.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/275530.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 8 Oct 2008 12:43:56]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ roobaby45]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>I like her hopefully they keep her. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/275820.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/275820.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 8 Oct 2008 15:00:27]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ heavensrose]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>I think she's still undercover, that she's actually working for the anarchists, infiltrating the unit & special forces in general, to take them down, use the families as bait to force the men to do what the anarchists want. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/286742.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/286742.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 13 Oct 2008 08:20:44]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ rabuf999]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>I think she's a great addition to the show besides the fact that she's hawt. She plays the role well and having a female in the unit opens new advantages to the team. I hope they keep her around </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/287057.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/287057.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:18:47]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ cork_screw]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p> She is unattractive and untalented .. She ruins The Unit and I'll not miss seeing her ugly face on the show !! </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/288085.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/288085.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 13 Oct 2008 18:15:17]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ wolflady123]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>I think that she is beautiful and she will keep this show alive even more. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/288542.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/288542.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 13 Oct 2008 21:11:30]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ unitlover55]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>Whether Nicole is beautiful or not is not the issue.  The issue is do we all like the change in dynamics of the show with her on board.  The answer for me is no I do not like the change.  TPTB are messing with the show in an effort to appeal more to the 18-49 age group.  38% more people in that age group watched <i>Brothers and Sisters </i> on Sunday Oct 5 rather than <i>The Unit </i>. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/289057.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/289057.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 14 Oct 2008 00:17:05]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ mxmartinifan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>I don't think that the producers expected huge changes in the form of those B&S viewers switching shows, at least entirely and not yet.  I think that the addition of Bridget, plus more of an emphasis on making the wives stronger and more independent, was partly to appeal to new viewers, as well as reflecting certain changing dynamics in this country and the world.  People, not all but a good amount, respond positively to female characters who are smart, capable, and well-rounded.  While I love TU, I do have to admit that those have not always been qualities that could be attributed to the women on the show.  I think the writers and producers are trying to rectify that now, and that Bridget is, as Nicole herself said in an interview, an actual bridge between the husbands and the wives so that the show, as a whole, could be a bit more cohesive.  Whether they achieve those things or not isn't something that can be determined right now, I don't think, given that the season just started and it takes time to make new elements gel effectively.  I will say that, at first, I was leery about the addition of Bridget into the show, and the team, because as a woman myself, I usually find attempts to introduce new, supposedly strong female characters into a show to be transparent pandering.  In this case, though, I think Bridget is an interesting character and a good addition to the show.  She's obviously competent and can get things done, and can provide the guys with intel and access to people and situations they might not otherwise have gotten.  I think she serves a real purpose, and I personally don't think that her being added to the show has hurt it at all in terms of tone and the preexisting dynamics between the characters. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/289214.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/289214.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 14 Oct 2008 02:23:12]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ dagaz_82]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>PLEASE lose the new chick.  I'm a woman and I did not feel offended that there were no women in 'the unit' so why add one now?  It wasn't necessary and it cheapens the show.  At the very least, you could have added someone realistic instead of a barbie lookalike.  Special forces military women do not wear makeup and highlight their hair.  You took a perfectly good action show and turned it into a soap opera.  Sadly, if she ends up being a regular on the show, my husband and I will not watch anymore. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/291658.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/291658.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 14 Oct 2008 23:00:47]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ jems1304]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>I do not like the way her character has changed the dynamic of the team in the field.  I hope she doesn't stick around very long.  Her chemistry with the rest of the cast is not good.  The scene with her and Foley dancing in the club last week was horrible.  He seemed more annoyed to have her there then anything else. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/293089.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/293089.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 15 Oct 2008 14:46:42]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ dlemon1]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>I think Foley's character was annoyed with Bridgette too in the scene when she was handing out the clothes and saying she would be the "eye candy" at the club, and when she made that remark about Col. Ryan, and when she was yapping to Jonas in the last scenes. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/293139.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/293139.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:04:35]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ mxmartinifan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>mxmartinifan wrote: </cite>I think Foley's character was annoyed with Bridgette too in the scene when she was handing out the clothes and saying she would be the "eye candy" at the club, and when she made that remark about Col. Ryan, and when she was yapping to Jonas in the last scenes. </div>		</blockquote>Exactly!  I just do not like the way she is playing with the rest of the cast. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/293534.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/293534.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:21:46]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ dlemon1]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>There's some news re: Nicole's status with the show.  I'll leave a little space, so if you don't want to know, it'd be a good idea to stop reading now. Okay, I know that this won't make some people happy, but for those of who like Bridget, it's good news:  From the Oct. 21 "Ask Ausiello" from Entertainment Weekly's website - <i>Question: I really like the new female member of The Unit, Nicole Steinwedell (Bridget). Is she signed for the full season? -- MikeAusiello: She is now! Although Steinwedell started the season as a recurring guest star, sources confirm to me exclusively that she's now an official series regular. Word is that the actress was introduced in part to make the show more enticing to women, particularly now that CBS has paired The Unit with the female-skewing Cold Case. But executive producer Shawn Ryan says Bridget serves a creative purpose as well. "The show was feeling like two different parts -- the male-mission part and the women-at-home part," he says. "Injecting this character into both sides of it, to us, has made the show feel a little bit more connected." </i></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/310101.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/310101.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:02:26]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ dagaz_82]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>dagaz_82 wrote: </cite> Okay, I know that this won't make some people happy... </div>		</blockquote>You're right.  I'm already gagging. <img src="/forum/images/smilies/c30b4198e0907b23b8246bdd52aa1c3c.gif" /></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/310146.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/310146.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:19:12]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ mxmartinifan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>Re the above post: I can now ask...  WTH?????? <img src="/forum/images/smilies/385970365b8ed7503b4294502a458efa.gif" /><img src="/forum/images/smilies/0a4d7238daa496a758252d0a2b1a1384.gif" /></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/310251.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/310251.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:56:49]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ roobaby45]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>Re the above news: I can now ask...  WTH?????? <img src="/forum/images/smilies/385970365b8ed7503b4294502a458efa.gif" /><img src="/forum/images/smilies/0a4d7238daa496a758252d0a2b1a1384.gif" />Better to make Susan Matus and Kavita Patil series regulars since they have been on regularly. I mean, that's a freakin' NO BRAINER!!! </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/310259.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/310259.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:58:55]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ roobaby45]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>That's GREAT news about Nicole!!!!!!!! <img src="/forum/images/smilies/283a16da79f3aa23fe1025c96295f04f.gif" /></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/310348.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/310348.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 22 Oct 2008 19:48:40]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ angel_in_la]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>While I certainly agree that the flow of storylines in the first season was my favorite of all, the viewpoints on this board about the writers having to mix things up a bit, because of the changes in public opinion towards combat situations abroad, is a welcome one if it manages to float the series into a few more seasons. While I appreciate the opinion of those who are Unit "Purists", it is a bit like the crappiness of certain books or movies in a trilogy/series... who would rather complain about a certain volume/episode/sequel... than have the idea die at season 4 because core fans can't stomach the transition.I do get the whole idea that all of us are here because we LOVE The Unit, or we wouldn't waste time discussing it. But WOW! There are certainly some heated responses about the awkward changes that have been made lately. Relax, enjoy, comment, but understand that the evolution of the series is to attract a larger fanbase that may ultimately renew the series. If they're smart, they read what we say. We're not a HUGE community here, and they'd be stupid to ignore core fans.Just my $0.02 </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/310793.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/310793.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 22 Oct 2008 22:38:10]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Squirrel1772]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><b>Squirrel1772 </b>, I agree.  This is just my opinion, but I think the idea behind the addition of the character is sound - it makes sense that a female could help out on some of the missions.  I know that some people were worried that she'd tag along on all of the ops, but we've already seen that that's not the case.  And it's true that some of the writing for her has been uneven, but now that her status with the show has been solidified, one would think that that would allow the writers to be more consistent with her and develop the character more.  As for the purpose of the character - to connect the storylines - I think it's a good idea to make the show more cohesive, as a whole - that makes it more accessible for new viewers.  I know that there are people who don't like the character, but there are also a lot of people who do, so Bridget just joins the ranks of the other polarizing characters.  So, the situation hasn't been perfect, thus far, but the show and its writers have had to deal with significant changes, as have the fans.  It's taken awhile for the writers to get into the groove of things, but I also think that that's because of the story they're trying to tell.  I think that all of the issues that have been raised about storylines that don't make all that much sense or seem unnecessary likely all tie into the big, overarching story that we're probably going to start seeing soon (just speculation on my part).  That said, I look at this like <b>Squirrel1772 </b> suggested: I love this show, and if it has to undergo some changes (that some people like and some don't) in order to remain on the air, so be it.  I know that mileage varies and that everyone's entitled to his or her opinion, but personally, I don't enjoy every single character or aspect of the show, though I'm more than willing to put up with them if it means that the show gets to live on for more seasons. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/311155.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/311155.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 23 Oct 2008 02:27:44]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ dagaz_82]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>Both point of views are well taken. I didn't think of it that way.  My shock at Nicole becomming a series regualr is more about how a newcomer makes it to that coveted status after 4 episodes while other recurring cast have been on for the last 3 seasons without the safety of that status.  However, both Squirrel and Dagaz make very good points.  My thinking is changing on this one. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/311257.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/311257.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 23 Oct 2008 07:13:46]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ roobaby45]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>Squirrel1772 wrote: </cite>While I certainly agree that the flow of storylines in the first season was my favorite of all, the viewpoints on this board about the writers having to mix things up a bit, because of the changes in public opinion towards combat situations abroad, is a welcome one if it manages to float the series into a few more seasons. While I appreciate the opinion of those who are Unit "Purists", it is a bit like the crappiness of certain books or movies in a trilogy/series... who would rather complain about a certain volume/episode/sequel... than have the idea die at season 4 because core fans can't stomach the transition.I do get the whole idea that all of us are here because we LOVE The Unit, or we wouldn't waste time discussing it. But WOW! There are certainly some heated responses about the awkward changes that have been made lately. Relax, enjoy, comment, but understand that the evolution of the series is to attract a larger fanbase that may ultimately renew the series. If they're smart, they read what we say. We're not a HUGE community here, and they'd be stupid to ignore core fans.Just my $0.02 </div>		</blockquote>I will watch but I could get into it more if there was not a female.  Thee are no females in Special forces.So I have a hard time relating to her and I do not trust her.  I still think she could be a plant by the Colonel's Ex-wife Charlotte.   She is the leak or it seems that way.Sounds like you know something of this.  Maybe a writer or in production.  Sorry I do not know all the termsTake Care,Robin. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/311806.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/311806.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:59:06]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ adoggperson]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>Squirrel1772 wrote: </cite>While I appreciate the opinion of those who are Unit "Purists", it is a bit like the crappiness of certain books or movies in a trilogy/series... who would rather complain about a certain volume/episode/sequel... than have the idea die at season 4 because core fans can't stomach the transition. </div>		</blockquote>Squirrel1772, I certainly respect your opinion and understand the point you are making, but I do have to make a comment on the above quote about the posters here "complaining."  First off, the group of writers that sat down and hashed out their storyline arcs for Season Four had this idea that adding a female character would help the show get better ratings.  Well, not every idea that writers come up with are good ones and we're here to tell them so.  Second, thank God for people who complain.  We could still be using lye soap instead of <i>Dove </i> or <i>Irish Spring </i> or hand washing all our dishes instead of using a dishwasher.  And third, I don't believe for one minute that anything we post here is going to have any effect whatsoever on the fate of <i>The Unit </i>--whether it is renewed in 2009 or not.  It's the ratings and number of viewers watching the show.  And fourth, I think that the people on this board who don't like our complaints don't like it because we disagree with them. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/311825.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/311825.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:05:27]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ mxmartinifan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>True, we're not a HUGE fan base, but we are STRONG. The core fan base is still watching every week. It is STILL the best scripted show on TV. It STILL has some of the best talent on board, both in front of the camera and off. I'm just kind of surprised that Nicole became a regular so fast. But then again, what the heck do I know about how the producers think? They may have something incredible planned for this season which I haven't seen yet. I keep hearing episodes 7 and 8 are the biggies.  Can't wait!Drat. This week's episode is still 3 full days away. Thsi week is sure going slowly. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/312011.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/312011.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:25:32]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ roobaby45]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>roobaby45 wrote: </cite>Both point of views are well taken. I didn't think of it that way.  My shock at Nicole becomming a series regualr is more about how a newcomer makes it to that coveted status after 4 episodes while other recurring cast have been on for the last 3 seasons without the safety of that status.  However, both Squirrel and Dagaz make very good points.  My thinking is changing on this one. </div>		</blockquote>That's an interesting point about the other recurring characters.  Obviously I don't know why their status hasn't changed, but I wonder if it's just because that's the nature of the characters - the writers, for whatever reason - think that they aren't needed/can't be used on a full-time basis.  Then, too, it could be beneficial for the actors that portray them.  While being a series regular would obviously be a career boost for them, their current status allows them to work on TU while also having the opportunity to work on other shows and projects. Also, I completely agree about eps 7 and 8 - I think that (if it doesn't happen before then) those are the eps that might bring together the elements (some of which have caused confusion amongst the fans) from the eps we've seen thus far, and really show us what the big story is this season. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/312255.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/312255.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:02:05]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ dagaz_82]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>First off, that's the nature of Show Biz.  Especially Film and TV Series.   The big guys are always looking for ways to save money and cast is one of those ways.With Nicole, they are trying to up the ratings and attract the younger demographic.  If this occurs, it's worth much more then her salary, in terms of how much they can charge sponsors.Just my humble opinion, after working in this biz for most of my working life.   I have no problem with her.  She is sooooo much better then that American Idol lady in MP's...sheesh!Go Nicole! <img src="/forum/images/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" /></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/312384.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/312384.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:51:49]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ angel_in_la]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>angel_in_la wrote: </cite>She is sooooo much better then that American Idol lady in MP's...sheesh! </div>		</blockquote>Gotta agree with you on that singer they had to protect in MP's.  She was awful.  And besides that, there were not that many Max minutes in that episode to suit me.  LOL </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/312604.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/312604.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:19:31]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ mxmartinifan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>Angel, NOW I remember MPs! Gawd that chick was...never mind I can't say it here. Dagaz, I tend to think that the story arc is much bigger  and more comprehensive than what we are getting a taste of now.  The guys finally get back to their Army roots and Ryan will get what's coming in 7 and 8. At least, that's what I've heard. November is getting closer! As a matter of fact, so is SUNDAY! </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/312931.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/312931.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 23 Oct 2008 20:20:10]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ roobaby45]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>angel_in_la wrote: </cite>First off, that's the nature of Show Biz.  Especially Film and TV Series.   The big guys are always looking for ways to save money and cast is one of those ways.With Nicole, they are trying to up the ratings and attract the younger demographic.  If this occurs, it's worth much more then her salary, in terms of how much they can charge sponsors.Just my humble opinion, after working in this biz for most of my working life.   I have no problem with her.  She is sooooo much better then that American Idol lady in MP's...sheesh!Go Nicole! <img src="/forum/images/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" /></div>		</blockquote>Hi Angel,  I figured that and the political correct thing too.  But by adding her it is not as accurate as before.I cannot get past "No women in SF" To me it is like cowing down to the system.   Plus I think she is part of the leak and for all we know she was a plant from Charlotte, the Colonel's ex-wife.Just a thought. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/313043.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/313043.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 23 Oct 2008 20:58:03]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ adoggperson]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>I'm not downplaying the weird angles they threw in (I'm not sure I like them either)I'm not convinced Nicole will add a generous amount of substance to the plot (but I like her so far)I'm not whining about other board members complaining (every one of us here has passion about this show)I'm not here to stir thing up, I just prefer when the discussions don't take the "she sucks!" "Crappy writers" "Lame plot" "retarded actors" kind of tone.Hey,  we all love this show, and opinions are varied. I just like to see a more civil approach sometimes, and it's easy for the new guy to interject a little "time out". Lots of times the discussion resumes or heats up, but with a little more civility, that's all.And as I recall, we are here to bounce ideas off each other, about what we'd like to see in the show...but hope that the writer/producer/director...who ever... might stop in to see what we're thinking.  But I see that some of you already agree. <blockquote>			<div>				<cite>mxmartinifan wrote: </cite>... not every idea that writers come up with are good ones and we're here to tell them so.... </div>		</blockquote><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>mxmartinifan wrote: </cite>... I don't believe for one minute that anything we post here is going to have any effect whatsoever on the fate of <i>The Unit </i>--whether it is renewed in 2009 or not... </div>		</blockquote><img src="/forum/images/smilies/8a80c6485cd926be453217d59a84a888.gif" /></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/313268.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/313268.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 23 Oct 2008 22:07:06]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Squirrel1772]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>Squirrel1772 wrote: </cite>I'm not downplaying the weird angles they threw in (I'm not sure I like them either)I'm not convinced Nicole will add a generous amount of substance to the plot (but I like her so far)I'm not whining about other board members complaining (every one of us here has passion about this show)I'm not here to stir thing up, I just prefer when the discussions don't take the "she sucks!" "Crappy writers" "Lame plot" "retarded actors" kind of tone.Hey,  we all love this show, and opinions are varied. I just like to see a more civil approach sometimes, and it's easy for the new guy to interject a little "time out". Lots of times the discussion resumes or heats up, but with a little more civility, that's all.And as I recall, we are here to bounce ideas off each other, about what we'd like to see in the show...but hope that the writer/producer/director...who ever... might stop in to see what we're thinking.  But I see that some of you already agree. <blockquote>			<div>				<cite>mxmartinifan wrote: </cite>... not every idea that writers come up with are good ones and we're here to tell them so.... </div>		</blockquote><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>mxmartinifan wrote: </cite>... I don't believe for one minute that anything we post here is going to have any effect whatsoever on the fate of <i>The Unit </i>--whether it is renewed in 2009 or not... </div>		</blockquote></div>		</blockquote>If I came across like that I am so sorry.  I guess I am for trying to make it as accurate as possible and adding a female is just wrong especially if it was for better ratings..  A slight part of me thinks if she stays perm. with the wives to protect them I could handle that a bit better. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/313295.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/313295.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 23 Oct 2008 22:13:19]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ adoggperson]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>adoggperson wrote: </cite>If I came across like that I am so sorry.  I guess I am for trying to make it as accurate as possible and adding a female is just wrong especially if it was for better ratings..  A slight part of me thinks if she stays perm. with the wives to protect them I could handle that a bit better. </div>		</blockquote>No, certainly not. I agree with the realism taking a hit, by apparently allowing her to become a member without passing SEER or any other testing. I don't like that either. I don't mean to imply I was offended by anything anybody said, either. I belong to numerous forums for motorcycle riders, and I just tend to have a habit of being sensitive to when the dialogue gets brash. You guys here are pretty tame, and I really like the discussions that I've been catching up on.I was just "checking" the tone, and by way of apology, I hope I didn't step on anyone's toes... <img src="/forum/images/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" />That being said, I like her addition, but am unsure as to what direction I'd like her character to go. But the stereotypical use of her as "eye candy" operative is not far fetched, and frankly is common in law enforcement, but as a full fledged member of the unit... well they had to stick her in somehow, they just weren't thinking clearly enough, I guess. OR as the season unfolds, it may be one of those "I TOLD THEM NOT TO ACCEPT A CHICK IN THE UNIT!" moments... <img src="/forum/images/smilies/97ada74b88049a6d50a6ed40898a03d7.gif" /></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/313366.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/313366.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 23 Oct 2008 22:29:25]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Squirrel1772]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>I've been completely shocked and dismayed at the vehemently negative posts that started right after the season premiere. I don't remember users posting such awful messages during the other 3 seasons.  If users don't think the network watch this site and IMDB, then are mistaken.  They were watching the Jericho board back in the day. I understand that there are people who don't like the new direction the show's taken and don't care for Bridget. It's been a little difficult to take after 3 seasons of superb shows. However, a little civility goes a long way. And they very well could be trying to expand their fan base to keep it on the air longer. I'm all for that. I tend to not believe all the columnists who are calling for a mid season cancelation or May cancelation. We're only 4 episodes into a season of 22. Hope and Faith remain strong. I'm happy that Nicole is able to secure more steady work in a profession where steady work is not the norm. But hopefully, this move won't mean other regulars will have less scenes. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/314032.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/314032.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 24 Oct 2008 07:19:47]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ roobaby45]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><font color='black'>I have bee thinking about all of the crap that has been talked about Red Cap since her appearance. And then again people say that the show has lost some with the loss of Eric Haney. Well I was watching the 2004 movie "Spartan" and what do my eyes see. Movie info first, Val Kilmer's character is an elite operator you would presume Delta but it is never really confirmed or denied. But in the begining you see Derek Luke chasing Tia Texada (Yes the FEMALE Sgt. from 3rd watch). She was assisting with the selection process. But later in the movie Kilmer's character realizes he needs her help. And with out her his mission would have failed.Was she a Delta Operator? No she was not. Was she helpful? Hell yes she was. Face it guys there are things that women can do so much better than guys.Ok who is going to take my guy card? </font></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/314310.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/314310.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 24 Oct 2008 10:25:38]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ axe141]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>We're not going to take your guy card.  But we are going to forbid you to watch <i>Spartan </i> again.  Ha ha. LOL </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/314750.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/314750.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:29:45]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ mxmartinifan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>roobaby45 wrote: </cite>It is STILL the best scripted show on TV. </div>		</blockquote>Roo, I view you with the utmost respect for all you have done for TU, but I would like to say that I disagree with you on the above point.  If you haven't watched a lot of other TV shows then you may not be familiar with some of the great scriptwriters and the work they are doing on other shows.  Jerry Bruckheimer is absolutely superb and others that I can't name right off hand.  Anyone who follows the soap operas can tell you that the writers can ruin a soap and take it down the wrong road, and the producers have to get rid of the writers.  There is a reason TU has low ratings and that we were on the bubble for renewal, that predictions are already being made about the underperformance of TU. I believe the writers are ruining this show.  Just watch <i>NCIS </i> once if you want to see a well scripted show.  I do not like what Mamet and the other writers are doing to TU because I believe ultimately their inferior writing will cost us this beautiful show and my enjoyment of seeing Max Martini up on the screen.  I say, "Fire the writers" and get some first-class people in there that can write a decent script. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/314803.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/314803.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:44:53]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ mxmartinifan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>FYI:Tia Texada was "Mariana" from 2 The Unit episodes.  Jonas watched her die in Pandemonium Part 1.I never watched Spartan, but wasn't that where Mamet and Eric Haney first worked together? </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/314819.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/314819.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:48:37]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ angel_in_la]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>This is my opinion and I'm not dissing anyone else's. I must say that since I've been accused of telling people they can't have an opinion.  To address some of the items in the last post: I do watch a lot of other TV shows. I watch NCIS and Two and Half Men, among others. Both are excellent sources of good writing.  TV writing is something I am not qualified to comment on since I have never done it. I have a vague idea of how it works. And I would need some time to reach out to my sources to get a real answer of how it works.  Our Unit writers are no slouches. They have years of experience and have been written on some other great shows. There is nothing inferior about them. You may not like what you see each week, but that doesn't make them inferior. They have an enormous order to fill and I think with less staff this year than last. (Yes, the financial crisis is hurting the network too.) They are doing a very good job.   The Unit was on the bubble because it's always on the bubble every year. IMO, only the top 20 broadcast shows ever get an immediate renewal for the next year. You can believe all the speculation and predictions you want. You can believe in the various ratings lists on the net. But the bottom line is: WE ARE ONLY AT EPISODE 5. We have NO IDEA where this story arc will take us this season. None. If you are a fan of this show, as many on this forum and others have passionately stated for the last 3 years, then I beg you to have some faith. Have faith in this mission they're taking us on.  Have faith that the best is yet to come!  Be patient.    Finally, I would not have done as much I have for this show if it was not for the love and respect I have for ALL the talent on screen and off. And I'm not done yet. Please understand that no matter how rough some of the comments have been on Nicole and the first 4 episodes,  this show is not interactive. You can complain all you want. But nothing will change. So your choice is to watch it and enjoy it or turn it off. It really is a good show and IMO, the best scripted program on TV.  Angel, Haney and Mamet met on Spartan. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/315464.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/315464.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 24 Oct 2008 18:02:14]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ roobaby45]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>Dear Roo, I love how we are having a <i>civilized </i>, <i>courteous </i> disagreement.  Trust me, I will watch this show to the bitter end as long as Max Martini is on the show.  After all, I even watch him in those awful <i>Lifetime </i> movies.  LOLRosemary </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/315505.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/315505.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 24 Oct 2008 18:22:36]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ mxmartinifan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>Roobaby, that was very well said.  Sure, it could be argued that some elements of the episodes have been somewhat muddled, but I still think that that's because we've only seen small factors of what is a soon-to-be-revealed main story-arch.  I have faith that the writers will pull it all together.  And for all of the worries about Bridget, I think the show has been pretty clear so far in showing that her work with the unit is in more of a support capacity - she has gathered information and provided distractions/access to a bad guy or two, but the guys have been allowed to do the main work (as they always have), and I don't think we've seen any indication that that's going to change.  Again, I think the writers know what they're doing - they know that they have to balance efforts to appeal to new viewers while ensuring that the show, at its core, doesn't fundamentally change, and that the loyal fans don't feel ignored.  There may be some bumps in the road, but I think that the writers are fully capable of working with all of these elements.  This is why I'm of the opinion that TU is, if not the best scripted-drama on TV, it's pretty close. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/316574.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/316574.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 25 Oct 2008 02:46:36]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ dagaz_82]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>dagaz:  Well said.  Thanks.As a person who works in an industry that is involved in entertainment, it keeps bothering me, when people dis the writer's of this excellent show (some of whom I have met).  These are NOT stupid people, they are incredibly creative people who know what they are doing.  I may not agree with everything and of course, time and money constraints come into play, but for the most part, they put in long hours and hope that at the end of the day, they have created something that will not only entertain you today, but have meaning tomorrow.Please give them a break and have faith in their skill.Still looking forward to going where the writer's send us. <img src="/forum/images/smilies/b2eb59423fbf5fa39342041237025880.gif"  /></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/317082.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/317082.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:01:57]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ angel_in_la]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>YAY! <img src="/forum/images/smilies/e8a506dc4ad763aca51bec4ca7dc8560.gif" /> I wholeheartedly agree with many of the opinions here, and am glad the discussions are more civil than the day I came. I look forward to tomorrow's episode, even if the story sucks, because it's one more day that the writers can have confidence that while they tweak the show to hang on to another season, we all will be here through the bumps to cheer our favorite characters through the episodes we will love forever. Life is not about hanging on to episodes you didn't like, it's remembering the episodes and seasons you loved so much that you couldn't even TRY to forget them... (insert poignant metaphor here...LOL)Life goes on... lets hope TU does, also!! </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/317121.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/317121.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:21:54]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Squirrel1772]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>Squirrel1772 wrote: </cite>YAY! <img src="/forum/images/smilies/e8a506dc4ad763aca51bec4ca7dc8560.gif" /> I wholeheartedly agree with many of the opinions here, and am glad the discussions are more civil than the day I came. I look forward to tomorrow's episode, even if the story sucks, because it's one more day that the writers can have confidence that while they tweak the show to hang on to another season, we all will be here through the bumps to cheer our favorite characters through the episodes we will love forever. Life is not about hanging on to episodes you didn't like, it's remembering the episodes and seasons you loved so much that you couldn't even TRY to forget them... (insert poignant metaphor here...LOL)Life goes on... lets hope TU does, also!! </div>		</blockquote>Hear!Hear!! <img src="/forum/images/smilies/283a16da79f3aa23fe1025c96295f04f.gif" /><img src="/forum/images/smilies/8a80c6485cd926be453217d59a84a888.gif" />Nyn </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/317129.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/317129.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:25:56]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ nynaevelan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>I double that hear hear! <img src="/forum/images/smilies/e8a506dc4ad763aca51bec4ca7dc8560.gif" /></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/318573.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/318573.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 25 Oct 2008 22:30:20]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ roobaby45]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>I don't have a problem with her joining the team, but I hope that they use her for more than her eyecandy, babysitter, and operator roles. I think if they can come up with some situations where she really pulls her own weight, and shows she belongs that things will take care of itself. She's tall, and very athletic looking. I think she can handle some fights, and crazy stunt type things. I don't know about you guys, but I don't mind a girl who can kick some ass. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/321260.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/321260.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 27 Oct 2008 03:22:21]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ TVFanTVStop]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>I certainly hope she evolves into a more active character, also. I do believe they're being cautious, but the last episode proved that sometimes you NEED a woman (unit member following into women's restroom...BAD if male!) and she adds some diplomatic weight into negotiational situations. Let's hope she can kick ass too...LOL </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/321958.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/321958.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 27 Oct 2008 13:23:25]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Squirrel1772]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>Squirrel1772 wrote: </cite>I certainly hope she evolves into a more active character, also. I do believe they're being cautious, but the last episode proved that sometimes you NEED a woman (unit member following into women's restroom...BAD if male!) and she adds some diplomatic weight into negotiational situations. Let's hope she can kick ass too...LOL </div>		</blockquote> She already emasculates the men <img src="/forum/images/smilies/2786c5c8e1a8be796fb2f726cca5a0fe.gif" /> The Unit is now The Bridget Hour with the Unit men and wives supporting her which is why the ratings/demos are dropping weekly <img src="/forum/images/smilies/2786c5c8e1a8be796fb2f726cca5a0fe.gif" /></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/322559.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/322559.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 27 Oct 2008 18:24:13]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ wolflady123]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>First of all, the ratings are NOT dropping weekly. They are FLUCUATING. We have been holding a steady 9 mil every week since the premiere. The Unit had 9.10 mil viewers this week. But the World Series was on at the same time, different channel. Secondly, Nicole was damn good in this episode. She played her part well and was believable. And is in no way responsible for any flucuation in the ratings. Bridget is a good support person and in this episode she was needed. But ya didn't see her shoot a gun or bash some bad guys over the head. As for seeing ker kick some booty, BRING IT ON! </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/322731.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/322731.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 27 Oct 2008 19:28:20]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ roobaby45]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>The World Series was on, but there was no Sunday Night Football, so I wouldn't think the World Series had much of an effect on ratings. It essentially cancelled out the fact that there was no football.I'm starting to come around on Bridgette; the first episode had me really worried, especially about her acting and her role in the show, but each episode she seems to have gotten a little more comfortable and now I think she's starting to gel pretty well.  I hope they don't turn her into an operator in the exact same role as the guys, but in the roles she has been in so far I like her. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/322816.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/322816.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:07:14]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ callahanm328]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>As far as the World Series goes, Marc Berman at Mediaweek seems to be of the opinion that it did cut into TU's ratings a bit; whether that's true or not, I don't know, but at least the ratings went up from what they were last week.  Watching last night's episode, I definitely got the impression that Nicole is more comfortable in the role, just as Bridget is becoming more comfortable working with the team.  I really enjoyed the way she interacted with the guys - she was able to provide some help, but she didn't alter their overall dynamic or attempt to take the lead.  As for the butt-kicking, I completely agree that it will likely happen, but the writers are taking their time about it.  I'm sure they are well aware of the...resistance that has been voiced in re: to a woman working with the team, so they're taking it slowly in terms of letting people get used to her presence, both in terms of the team adjusting to Bridget, and the fans adjusting to her, as well.  I have noticed that some of the people on various boards who were very much against her at the start, are now slowly starting to accept her.  I think that when the adjustment period is over, and people accept (more or less) seeing a woman working in conjunction with the guys, they'll give her more to do in terms of kicking butt and taking names.  That said, I don't get the sense that she'll necessarily ever fully take part in the heavy-lifting that the guys do, so to speak.  I think she'll be able to play a fairly significant role in some of the missions, but the guys are always going to be the ones who are more in the thick of things. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/323334.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/323334.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 28 Oct 2008 04:01:56]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ dagaz_82]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>Dagaz:I agree because I find myself not being as critical of her performance as I was when she first started.  Who knows I may even grow to like her, though she will never be as good as Hector.Nyn </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/323342.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/323342.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 28 Oct 2008 04:23:05]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ nynaevelan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>The word "tolerance" comes to mind when I think of the female operator known as Bridget.  Mentally, I just throw her in the pile along with Tiffy and others (i.e., Ziva David) of the TV characters that I have to tolerate in order to watch the shows I like. <img src="/forum/images/smilies/2e207fad049d4d292f60607f80f05768.gif" /></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/323604.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/323604.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:19:53]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ mxmartinifan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>Conspiracy Theory:I think she's a spy and the Unit is on to her. Who gets added to the Unit without going to the strict training and weeding out process? No one. Remember the episode where Bob was going through it? There is no way they would allow someone to just join up just because she helped them in a mission. I'm thinking she is a spy and it will be brought to light sometime in the next couple of episodes. Also, when she asked to join the Unit did you see the look between Ryan and Jonas? Keep your friends close and your enemies closer. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/324198.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/324198.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:54:07]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ UnitDiver]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>don't forget when she asked Jonas nodded at colonel ryan, and think he respects jonas' opinion. jonas wouldnt be ok w/ it if he didnt think she was able to do the job. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/324335.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/324335.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:50:12]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ TVFanTVStop]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>Just found this newest tidbit from Michael Ausiello - I think it might allay some fears that some people have about Bridget and her dealing with the guys.  I don't think it's technically a spoiler, but just in case, I'll leave some space.... - Question: Thanks for the scoop last week about The Unit making Nicole Steinwedell (Bridget) a series regular. How long before she starts canoodling with one of the guys? -- SamAusiello: That's a question for executive producer Shawn Ryan. So hey, I know! Let's ask him! "'I don't know yet' is the most honest answer I can give you," he answers. "What I will say is that we have a couple of people who consult on the show who were Delta Force operators, and they talked about the professionalism that the guys have. Obviously, our guys find time for romance, but we'll never do anything that feels unprofessional." </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/325482.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/325482.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 29 Oct 2008 05:15:28]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ dagaz_82]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>dagaz_82 wrote: </cite>Shawn Ryan. So hey, I know! Let's ask him! "'I don't know yet' is the most honest answer I can give you," he answers. "What I will say is that we have a couple of people who consult on the show who were Delta Force operators, and they talked about the professionalism that the guys have. Obviously, our guys find time for romance, but we'll never do anything that feels unprofessional." </div>		</blockquote>So, Tiffy and Ryan are professional???Nyn </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/325510.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/325510.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 29 Oct 2008 06:19:15]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ nynaevelan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>nynaevelan wrote: </cite><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>dagaz_82 wrote: </cite>Shawn Ryan. So hey, I know! Let's ask him! "'I don't know yet' is the most honest answer I can give you," he answers. "What I will say is that we have a couple of people who consult on the show who were Delta Force operators, and they talked about the professionalism that the guys have. Obviously, our guys find time for romance, but we'll never do anything that feels unprofessional." </div>		</blockquote>So, Tiffy and Ryan are professional???Nyn </div>		</blockquote>I believe he was talking about the guys and Bridget not canoodling together, since they are professional soldiers. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/325530.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/325530.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 29 Oct 2008 07:02:22]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ roobaby45]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>I just want to make sure that there are enough negative responses on here as possible. I hate this chick. They need to kill her off immediately. Preferably as bloody as possible. Maybe a shotgun blast to her ugly face. That would be awesome. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/325766.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/325766.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:02:33]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ apachemtrs]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>Nah. Bridget adds value now. She's been good support to the team. She's been good support for the wives. And hopefully they will soon let her kick some booty as repugnant as your post apachemtrs. <img src="/forum/images/smilies/ed515dbff23a0ee3241dcc0a601c9ed6.gif" /></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/326626.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/326626.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 29 Oct 2008 19:19:29]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ roobaby45]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>Very well said, roobaby! </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/327410.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/327410.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 30 Oct 2008 04:42:15]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ dagaz_82]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>first why is the world did they change the theme song from the cadence......the new one is terrible. I love this show but this new girl is terrible. I know some people don't think females work with SF, but they do, they are not officially SF but they do use them, but she just does not fit in with this show....I hope she is rogue, it'll add a little to the story line and get rid of her at the same time </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/328185.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/328185.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:03:05]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ jlbh222]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>I totally agree with everyone who thinks that a woman being a part of The Unit is bogus! I'm a female watcher, The Unit used to be something my husband and I watched together. We both really liked the action.. him being a marine he appreciated how "realistic" the shows were.. But now.. the show has just gotten to the point of stupidity. It's not realistic.. They wouldn't have a woman be apart of The Unit in real life.. Unless she's behind the phone maybe? I mean even the marines.. do NOT have female snipers.. The Unit members are supposed to be universal? Top 15% of the military? There were shows when that guy who ended up getting burned.. name not important enough to remember.. He wanted to be a part of the unit as a driver.. He was told it took years and years.. and even then NOT be selected.. So? Eh? This girl just shows up and she's in?? Give me a break! <img src="/forum/images/smilies/2e207fad049d4d292f60607f80f05768.gif" /> I hope she dies/leaves soon. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/328361.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/328361.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:25:14]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Is2MyMsgt]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>Is2MyMsgt wrote: </cite>I totally agree with everyone who thinks that a woman being a part of The Unit is bogus! I'm a female watcher, The Unit used to be something my husband and I watched together. We both really liked the action.. him being a marine he appreciated how "realistic" the shows were.. But now.. the show has just gotten to the point of stupidity. It's not realistic.. They wouldn't have a woman be apart of The Unit in real life.. Unless she's behind the phone maybe? I mean even the marines.. do NOT have female snipers.. The Unit members are supposed to be universal? Top 15% of the military? There were shows when that guy who ended up getting burned.. name not important enough to remember.. He wanted to be a part of the unit as a driver.. He was told it took years and years.. and even then NOT be selected.. So? Eh? This girl just shows up and she's in?? Give me a break! <img src="/forum/images/smilies/2e207fad049d4d292f60607f80f05768.gif" /> I hope she dies/leaves soon. </div>		</blockquote>Geesh. Do I have to repeat myself over and over again? <img src="/forum/images/smilies/2786c5c8e1a8be796fb2f726cca5a0fe.gif" />She is NOT a Delta Operator. She works for the DOD WITH the unit. She was not "just let in". She is SUPPORT. The character you're talking about is Jeremy and he was maybe 22 years old. Part of the Signal Ops, if I'm not mistaken. He was told by Ryan that if he wanted to be in the Unit in the future to stay in the Army and work his way up like all the rest. But decided to join Black Thorn instead, where he became a driver for them. He was out of the Army and working for Black Thorn when he got burned. I hope they keep Bridget for a while longer because her character is growing good on me.  She seems to be able to hold her own with the men and women. And judging from the fact that she now is a regular cast member, she ain't leavin' for a while. <img src="/forum/images/smilies/b2eb59423fbf5fa39342041237025880.gif"  />And before I forget, there is not a stupid thing about this show. You may not like the direction the show's taken thus far, but it is STILL the best scripted program on TV. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/331007.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/331007.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 31 Oct 2008 19:36:04]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ roobaby45]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>I am a woman who LOVES The Unit.  But as wonderful an actress as Nicole's character is, I am questioning my adoration for the series. My "feminine" side is plenty satisfied with seeing the wives and their dramas, how they cope with having men in combat.  It's not that I don't think women can kick butt, but Nicole's character doesn't behave in a believable way.  She's all T&A, and while that's fine, it's too much!  Makes it pretty obvious that the show thought "oh, we need more viewers - let's put a pretty lady in The Unit and keep our fingers crossed."  She acts and seems like a potential "temptress", most likely to Mack (seems like theyre dancing around some sort of chemistry if you ask me) - I want The Unit members to be focused on their missions, not a pretty girl.  They get distracted or involved with her and they risk the lives of themselves, their team members, and their country. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/331267.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/331267.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 31 Oct 2008 21:45:27]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ gwfan29]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>gwfan29 wrote: </cite>It's not that I don't think women can kick butt, but Nicole's character doesn't behave in a believable way.  She's all T&A, and while that's fine, it's too much!  Makes it pretty obvious that the show thought "oh, we need more viewers - let's put a pretty lady in The Unit and keep our fingers crossed."  She acts and seems like a potential "temptress", most likely to Mack (seems like theyre dancing around some sort of chemistry if you ask me) - I want The Unit members to be focused on their missions, not a pretty girl.  They get distracted or involved with her and they risk the lives of themselves, their team members, and their country. </div>		</blockquote>I agree that thus far, Bridget has been used in the eye-candy capacity a bit, but I think that there's a good reason behind that.  She's not a full-fledged member of the team, so they needed to show exactly how the team could benefit by working with a woman, and though it isn't ideal, it is logical that one role such a woman could play is that of eye-candy, both in terms of providing distractions and by being able to gather intel since people tend to underestimate women who are dressed in skimpy attire.  I think that the writers have shown why such a tactic is useful, and that now that that has been established, they're better able to move on and show other reasons why Bridget could be an asset.  In fact, I think "Dancing Lessons" was able to accomplish exactly that - she did begin the mission by being in a bathing suit, but later on, she was also able to employ some of her more interrogation-based skills, and she helped the guys with the Josephina situation.  I think that, slowly but surely, the writers are attempting to show the various reasons that it makes sense for a woman to be working with the team, and that the reason that they started off with the eye-candy bit was because that was what was expected, and in that way, it was a logical choice.  Now that they've shown the obvious reasons why working with a woman on some ops is reasonable, they sort of free themselves to show the other ways that her experience and DOD-related skills can come in handy.  As far as distracting the guys is concerned, they've all seen her in her skimpy clothing/disguises, and we didn't see any evidence that that took their minds off of the missions.  Plus, though guys will be guys and will obviously notice an attractive woman, I think that the team members are so highly skilled and trained that they wouldn't let something like that distract them or otherwise compromise the job they're doing. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/331821.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/331821.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 1 Nov 2008 04:20:02]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ dagaz_82]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>Well said Dagaz. <img src="/forum/images/smilies/283a16da79f3aa23fe1025c96295f04f.gif" />I ditto what he said. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/333681.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/333681.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 2 Nov 2008 06:32:49]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ roobaby45]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>dagaz_82 wrote: </cite>... <font color='blue'>I think that the team members are so highly skilled and trained that they wouldn't let something like that distract them or otherwise compromise the job they're doing. </font></div>		</blockquote>Maybe in real life special forces soldiers wouldn't be distracted by the eye candy but this is TV and CBS is bound and determined to feminize <i>The Unit </i>.  Ugh. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/335248.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/335248.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 2 Nov 2008 21:16:26]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ mxmartinifan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>I hear you about them apparently trying to feminize the show.  I think that's true to the extent that they've expanded the wives' roles and responsibilities (and though I trust the writers, I'm not completely on-board with this yet).  And I think that that could very well have something to do with the popularity of that Lifetime show "Army Wives."  As for Bridget, it's true that they've had her be T&A for at least part of each episode so far, but other than the occasional skimpy outfit, she hasn't been all that traditionally feminine (for lack of a better term) - she's been focused on ops, interrogated a bad guy or two, helped with Josephina, etc.  The point that I'm trying to make (and I don't think I'm doing too well with it because it's late and I'm really tired) is that she's only been "feminized" when she's on the job, not when she's off-duty or when she was helping the wives - she was pretty much all-business.  Then again, relatively speaking, she hasn't really had all that much screentime yet, so this is subject to change.  As a woman, I have to say that I like the character because she's shown that she's capable of helping the guys, while knowing when to step back and let them do what they do best. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/335882.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/335882.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 3 Nov 2008 05:27:25]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ dagaz_82]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>I hope they read these comments.  Get rid of her!  Nothing personal, Nicole, but not needed.  Oh, and by the way, bring back the rockin' theme song!  The whisper theme song bugs! </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/337624.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/337624.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 4 Nov 2008 00:02:39]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ brkfst4dnr]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>I think she's doing a great job, as are all the cast members. It's a great season! What a great show! </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/347421.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/347421.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 7 Nov 2008 15:38:17]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ jmmhogan1]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><span style="font-size: 18px; line-height: normal;"></span>I have watched the Unit since the premiere and I have to say I am VERY disappointed with this season.  I hate the new woman and the whole moving the team and all.  Who is she and where did she come from?  She is anot a believable character and I can't get over them adding her like that.  I have missed several shows beacause I hate looking at her and she is a terrible actress.  I see some think she is unattractive, I have to agree she is not all that she thinks she is on the show.  Last week she even unbottoned her shirt before interrogating that Arab student about the tunnel bomb.  She makes me sick.  I do not like her mixing with the men and I don't think I would like her hagning out with the wives.  She just doesn't click with them.  I also hope she is killed off soon before she kills the show.  And as far as she and Mack go, I hope he does NOT cheat with that skank.  Tiffy makes me mad too but the new woman I can't stand and he is too good for her. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/350481.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/350481.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 8 Nov 2008 10:18:32]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ shininghorse]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="/forum/images/smilies/499fd50bc713bfcdf2ab5a23c00c2d62.gif" />She can't fill Hector's shoes!<br /></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/352216.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/352216.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 8 Nov 2008 19:36:40]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ mrsblane2]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>roobaby45 wrote: </cite>Her parents were both in the Marines. Check out the interview TV Guide did with her yesterday. <img src="/forum/images/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" />http://community.tvguide.com /blog - entry/TV-Show-Blog/Tv-Previews /Unit-Nic - le-Steinwedell/800047542 </div>		</blockquote>she should not be in the team </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/352281.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/352281.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 8 Nov 2008 20:00:29]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ mikeb2400]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p> Plenty of opinions about Nicole and Bridget and many not enjoying the actress and or the character and have to say she has got to go <img src="/forum/images/smilies/2786c5c8e1a8be796fb2f726cca5a0fe.gif" /> I've been deliberately npt posting since I've been trying to give the new girl some kind of decent chance proving herseld but as I was watching I saw how she is NOT fitting on this show and for me as a viewer from the beginning I actually cringe as I watch her and have been thisclose to FF all her scenes.  I agree with alot of the others her only contribution to this show is either wearing skimpy clothes , showing off her boobs, and basically loooking like she is playing dress up . I do not find her pretty nor is she generating any chemistry with any of the guys on the show nor is she connecting with any of the wives either. She comes across as very much of an intrusion and she wasn't needed on this series so why was she added ? If TPTB put her with Mac I'll scream <img src="/forum/images/smilies/908627bbe5e9f6a080977db8c365caff.gif" /><img src="/forum/images/smilies/2e207fad049d4d292f60607f80f05768.gif" /> While Tiffy has not been always the best I'd rather see her and Mack reuning then to see Mack get stuck with the new girl <img src="/forum/images/smilies/2786c5c8e1a8be796fb2f726cca5a0fe.gif" /> I'll take any of the wives Molly, Tiffy, and Kim anyday over Bridget and also think Regina, Abby, and Audrey are all better actresses and far more prettier too ! </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/352749.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/352749.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 8 Nov 2008 22:05:35]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ theunitlover]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>Dear wolflady123  sorry to correct you but there are women in the special forces (though not widely advertised for obvious reasons Australia SAS and UK SAS both have women in their active service) the writers have hit the nail on the head with her Character. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/352787.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/352787.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 8 Nov 2008 22:15:45]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ buci_janika]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>Buci_Janika wrote: </cite>Dear wolflady123  sorry to correct you but there are women in the special forces (though not widely advertised for obvious reasons Australia SAS and UK SAS both have women in their active service) the writers have hit the nail on the head with her Character. </div>		</blockquote> You're wrong and wolflady  is right on this one.. There aren't any women on the lines as the way Bridget is on The Unit and TPTB are really pushing the envelops on this latest plot to the series <img src="/forum/images/smilies/2786c5c8e1a8be796fb2f726cca5a0fe.gif" /> I don't like the aggressiveness of wolflady and nice to not see her rantings but she is right on her statement about there being no women in the special forces . </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/352806.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/352806.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 8 Nov 2008 22:21:31]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ theunitlover]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>“Dear wolflady123 sorry to correct you but there are women in the special forces (though not widely advertised for obvious reasons Australia SAS and UK SAS both have women in their active service) the writers have hit the nail on the head with her Character. ” </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/353635.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/353635.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 9 Nov 2008 04:22:58]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ buci_janika]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>mrsblane2 wrote: </cite><img src="/forum/images/smilies/499fd50bc713bfcdf2ab5a23c00c2d62.gif" />She can't fill Hector's shoes!<br /></div>		</blockquote>NO ONE will ever be able to fill sweet, beautiful, funny Hector's shows. <img src="/forum/images/smilies/9d71f0541cff0a302a0309c5079e8dee.gif" />  And that's the point. You can't replace someone as valuable and professional as Hammerhead. Gawd, what I wouldn't do to hear him singin' "After Midnite" in my ear right now. <img src="/forum/images/smilies/c30b4198e0907b23b8246bdd52aa1c3c.gif" /></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/353717.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/353717.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 9 Nov 2008 06:51:33]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ roobaby45]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>Buci_Janika wrote: </cite>“Dear wolflady123 sorry to correct you but there are women in the special forces (though not widely advertised for obvious reasons Australia SAS and UK SAS both have women in their active service) the writers have hit the nail on the head with her Character. ” </div>		</blockquote> Again you're wrong and myself and others have given solid proof why there have never been any women in the special forces and TPTB are not rigtt in trying to say there are .. <img src="/forum/images/smilies/2786c5c8e1a8be796fb2f726cca5a0fe.gif" />   I suggest you get the facts not the fabrication you're trying to say is truth. The idiots in charge messed up with this mockery and by allowing Haney to get away was another enormous error in judgment <img src="/forum/images/smilies/2786c5c8e1a8be796fb2f726cca5a0fe.gif" /></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/353947.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/353947.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 9 Nov 2008 10:07:49]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ wolflady123]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>Gotta love all the people that have come and gone that are training for years to get into the Unit and they just plop this girl in to the team. What, she intersects with the team once, has a background in intel and POW she's in? I hope this is going somewhere with the overall season plot and isn't a backhanded insult to please somebody that thought we needed some T&A and at the same time appeal to more women. So far I'm not seeing it, and the fact that she was back at base this week calling the shots makes me think they're planning on sticking with her. She's brought NOTHING to the show. She could well be a brilliant actress, but so far she's been a sore thumb and an all-too-easy insert. Ditch her please before you totally kill the show. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/356490.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/356490.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 10 Nov 2008 00:30:24]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ PsychOps]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>i dont get all of this. she doesnt kill the show. she's just doing her part, and so far she hasnt been a major part of anything, but a supporting role. especially on some missions that w/o her would have been MUCH harder to accomplish. i think people should be more forgiving of some things, and focus on the action that goes on. if you're gonna be picky pick on that. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/356544.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/356544.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 10 Nov 2008 00:55:34]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ TVFanTVStop]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>TVFAnTVStop - I agree.  I know that people are concerned that she was brought on to replace Hector, or that she is unrealistic in terms of joining the team, but I think that the show has addressed those concerns.  There's never been any mention of her replacing Hector, likely because such a thing is impossible, and everyone involved with the show knows it.  And I think the show has made it pretty clear that while she works with the Unit, she isn't one of them.  Tonight was a good case in point - she did her job helping the team and she figured out the Colonel's plan, and was therefore able to make a crucial decision that helped him be able to get to Betsy.  What she did not do was join the guys out in the field, because that is not an area in which she could help them.  She's gotten them access to targets and information over the course of previous episodes, but all of the major action/heavy lifting has been engaged in by the guys, not her.  I think the articles that came out about her role in the show prior to the premiere were misleading.  She may have been added to the show, but she wasn't added to the team, per se.  She's there in a support capacity, which, from all that I've read, is in-keeping with the nature of the roles women play in these kinds of situations.  With all of that said, I think she did well in tonight's episode.  She wasn't out in the field, but she did provide some useful information and enabled Ryan to carry out his plan.  She was useful, but she didn't have massive amounts of screentime, so she didn't infringe on the time given to other characters.   It was a truly great episode, and her presence was a part of that, not something that detracted from it. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/356760.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/356760.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 10 Nov 2008 05:00:21]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ dagaz_82]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>you put it very well. when i was posting it was already super late. i agree w/ everything you said, but i also wouldnt mind seeing her kick some ass at somepoint, and be more part of the team AT TIMES, and maybe not ALL the time because then a bunch of "fans" of the show would freak out and flood these forums w/ hate. i said it in another post on here some where. im all for a chick who can kick some ass, and look hot doing it. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/357106.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/357106.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:13:58]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ TVFanTVStop]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><i>LOL.  Wasn't that the Alias show with Jennifer Garner?  I'm just saying. </i></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/357875.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/357875.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 10 Nov 2008 15:34:04]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Rivermaiden]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>I see where you're coming from, Rivermaiden.  For what it's worth, I don't think the show will ever go in an Alias-like direction.  I'm anxious to see Bridget kick some butt, too, but I don't think such a thing will ever happen with frequency, and I think that the roles Bridget plays in missions will continue to be along the lines of what we've seen thus far.  That way, she can be useful, but her actions won't strain the bounds of realism. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/358302.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/358302.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:17:17]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ dagaz_82]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>alias was such a bad show. i rented it through my netflix account, and the only reason i watched every single episode of every season was because i wanted to know how it ended up. i wish i could go back in time, and stop mid-way through season 1, if that. the unit isnt going to go anywhere near that. i just hope red cap gets a lil more than she's getting right now. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/358866.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/358866.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 10 Nov 2008 20:34:08]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ TVFanTVStop]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>I think it's great that they killed off a main character for the sake of adding eye candy. Thanks Shawn Ryan. You were Hollywood's last hope for real drama for me but hey...go for that ratings grab. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/363522.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/363522.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 12 Nov 2008 07:17:43]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ strakallah]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>although i liked hector, we all knew eventually one of them was going to die, or at least get seriously hurt. im fine w/ red cap. especially since yeah it does bring eye candy to the show, but it also gives the show another layer, and that means it could help the shows longevity. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/363731.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/363731.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:32:48]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ TVFanTVStop]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>No matter how we fans feel about the addition of Nicole to the cast she has been signed on for a full year.  That means this whole Season 4 we will have to deal with her being in the show.  Personally, I would have preferred TPTB to have added a male as a fifth member to replace Hector.  That would have been a logical move to make.  It was just kind of lame how Nicole was added.  Seeing her in the TOC in Kayla's domain was a little hard to accept.  In the <i>Inquisition </i> episode it was a little hard to see her reduced to unbuttoning her blouse to try to help get information out of Khalid.  But maybe that is what it will take to attract more viewers in the coveted demographic than we have in the core fan base.  We all just want <i>The Unit </i> to be on the air forever. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/364548.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/364548.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 12 Nov 2008 15:14:07]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ dreamashere]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>i was a little set back by the female unit member too, but it is TV... i still love the show and like everything else i am sure they will add a nice twist to her involvement.  keep the faith! </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/365470.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/365470.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:21:02]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ airgolas]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>TVFanTVStop wrote: </cite>you put it very well. when i was posting it was already super late. i agree w/ everything you said, but i also wouldnt mind seeing her kick some ass at somepoint, and be more part of the team AT TIMES, and maybe not ALL the time because then a bunch of "fans" of the show would freak out and flood these forums w/ hate. i said it in another post on here some where. im all for a chick who can kick some ass, and look hot doing it. </div>		</blockquote>I love <i>The Sarah Connor Chronicles </i> because that chick (Lena Headey) can kick some and she is really cute too. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/372743.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/372743.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:10:16]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ knightsgrace]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>knightsgrace wrote: </cite><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>TVFanTVStop wrote: </cite> - ou put it very well. when i was posting it was already super late. i agree w/ everything you said, but i also wouldnt mind seeing her kick some ass at somepoint, and be more part of the team AT TIMES, and maybe not ALL the time because then a bunch of "fans" of the show would freak out and flood these forums w/ hate. i said it in another post on here some where. im all for a chick who can kick some ass, and look hot doing it. </div>		</blockquote>I love <i>The Sarah Connor Chronicles </i> because that chick (Lena Headey) can kick some and she is really cute too. </div>		</blockquote>yeah she's a wonderful actress. i havent been watching TSCC cuz monday nights are so jam packed w/ shows i love that it'd take me all week to catch up on them via tivo, or online. i'll get it on dvd, and watch them all. i only saw the 1st episode of the season because of last seasons season finale was crazy. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/381453.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/381453.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 17 Nov 2008 00:33:58]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ TVFanTVStop]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>as far as red cap goes, she put her neck out there BIG time in this episode (into hell part 2), so haters should give her some slack. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/381456.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/381456.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 17 Nov 2008 00:34:49]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ TVFanTVStop]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>I'm with you, TVFanTVStop.  I haven't thought that the idea that she is their enemy has had all that much merit for quite some time now, and I think tonight's episode proved, once and for all, that she's one of the good guys.  So to speak. <img src="/forum/images/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" />True, the argument could be made that, if she were a traitor, she would have had to do something in order to completely earn their trust.  However, the fact that she went above and beyond to help them, and that they wouldn't have been rescued if not for her, doesn't really fall into that category.  After all, there would have been ways to earn their trust that wouldn't have risked her being court-martialed.  So, hopefully, this turn of events will put the kibosh on that theory. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/381718.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/381718.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:41:43]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ dagaz_82]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>TVFanTVStop and dagaz. I don't think anyone was debating her loyalty. I think for the most part, people are sick of Hollywood writing where if things are slipping they throw in a couple tits. Shawn Ryan has been a hero to me in the way that he seems to stay true to whatever series he is writing and is really creative with character development. However, Red Cap is a sign that Shawn Ryan is sleeping with Michael Bay.There are plenty of us out there that want to see creative writing in a series without taking short cuts to make people watch the show. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/381721.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/381721.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:48:56]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ strakallah]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>dagaz_82 wrote: </cite>I'm with you, TVFanTVStop.  I haven't thought that the idea that she is their enemy has had all that much merit for quite some time now, and I think tonight's episode proved, once and for all, that she's one of the good guys.  So to speak. <img src="/forum/images/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" />True, the argument could be made that, if she were a traitor, she would have had to do something in order to completely earn their trust.  However, the fact that she went above and beyond to help them, and that they wouldn't have been rescued if not for her, doesn't really fall into that category.  After all, there would have been ways to earn their trust that wouldn't have risked her being court-martialed.  So, hopefully, this turn of events will put the kibosh on that theory. </div>		</blockquote>i always found that theory extremely weak anyway, so yeah i do hope this squashes any thought of that. i dont expect people who dont want her on the show to like her now, but hopefully they're more accepting of her now. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/381983.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/381983.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:45:00]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ TVFanTVStop]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>strakallah wrote: </cite>TVFanTVStop and dagaz. I don't think anyone was debating her loyalty. I think for the most part, people are sick of Hollywood writing where if things are slipping they throw in a couple tits. Shawn Ryan has been a hero to me in the way that he seems to stay true to whatever series he is writing and is really creative with character development. However, Red Cap is a sign that Shawn Ryan is sleeping with Michael Bay.There are plenty of us out there that want to see creative writing in a series without taking short cuts to make people watch the show. </div>		</blockquote>understood, but i think to make a slight compromise like this to help invigorate the show a bit will help w/ its longevity (at least thats my hope). </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/381985.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/381985.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:46:50]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ TVFanTVStop]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>dagaz_82 wrote: </cite>Okay, I know that this won't make some people happy, but for those of who like Bridget, it's good news:  From the Oct. 21 "Ask Ausiello" from Entertainment Weekly's website - <i>Question: I really like the new female member of The Unit, Nicole Steinwedell (Bridget). Is she signed for the full season? -- MikeAusiello: She is now! Although Steinwedell started the season as a recurring guest star, sources confirm to me exclusively that she's now an official series regular. Word is that the actress was introduced in part to make the show more enticing to women, particularly now that CBS has paired The Unit with the female-skewing Cold Case. But executive producer Shawn Ryan says Bridget serves a creative purpose as well. "The show was feeling like two different parts -- the male-mission part and the women-at-home part," he says. "Injecting this character into both sides of it, to us, has made the show feel a little bit more connected." </i></div>		</blockquote>If  Nicole was upgraded to a regular cast member, why is she still listed as a guest star in the credits??  It's been almost a month since this posted on Ausiello.  Has anyone heard any more word on her status?Nyn </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/382719.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/382719.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:36:19]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ nynaevelan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>TVFanTVStop wrote: </cite><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>strakallah wrote: </cite>TV - anTVStop and dagaz. I don't think anyone was debating her loyalty. I think for the most part, people are sick of Hollywood writing where if things are slipping they throw in a couple tits. Shawn Ryan has been a hero to me in the way that he seems to stay true to whatever series he is writing and is really creative with character development. However, Red Cap is a sign that Shawn Ryan is sleeping with Michael Bay.There are plenty of us out there that want to see creative writing in a series without taking short cuts to make people watch the show. </div>		</blockquote>understood, but i think to make a slight compromise like this to help invigorate the show a bit will help w/ its longevity (at least thats my hope). </div>		</blockquote>Yeah but the thing is that Ryan is able to write Vic Mackey out of any imposible situation in The Shield. Why can't he try to be a bit more creative when making a ratings grab? </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/384318.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/384318.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 17 Nov 2008 23:50:04]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ strakallah]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>strakallah wrote: </cite><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>TVFanTVStop wrote: </cite>[q - ote=strakallah]TV - anTVStop and dagaz. I don't think anyone was debating her loyalty. I think for the most part, people are sick of Hollywood writing where if things are slipping they throw in a couple tits. Shawn Ryan has been a hero to me in the way that he seems to stay true to whatever series he is writing and is really creative with character development. However, Red Cap is a sign that Shawn Ryan is sleeping with Michael Bay.There are plenty of us out there that want to see creative writing in a series without taking short cuts to make people watch the show. </div>		</blockquote>understood, but i think to make a slight compromise like this to help invigorate the show a bit will help w/ its longevity (at least thats my hope). </div>		</blockquote>Yeah but the thing is that Ryan is able to write Vic Mackey out of any imposible situation in The Shield. Why can't he try to be a bit more creative when making a ratings grab? </div>		</blockquote>because a big part of having a hit show is developing new plots/characters to help the longevity of the show. i think they have to bring in new people/concepts/ideas to expand the fan base. i know in doing that you tend to alienate some of the more "true" fans, but to me the TRUE fans will see through it all, and appreciate the facets of the show that they love, and understand that some of the questionable things are there simply to help the show sustain itself. if the show was just the men doing missions every week w/o anything else going on it'd really be like a hardcore a-team of sorts. you have to develop characters for people to love/hate/care, and then do things that make you love/hate/care about that person(s) more. the fact that they were willing to kill off hector should show us all that they're not above killing a member of the team, and although hector (at least to me) wasn't a major facet of the team was still a wonderful part of the show. which to me means they could easily kill off anybody else within another season or two. thats why they need to develop more people now, so by that time we have others to help ease the blow. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/384428.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/384428.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:24:39]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ TVFanTVStop]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>Yeah I understand the killing Hector part off.I think it's unrealistic for a spec ops team to never lose a member when they seem to be facing 100-1 odds once per week.I'm just saying that bringing in eye candy just to create more interest in the show used to be a bit below Ryans creativity level. Doing that has been done to death in every recent movie and TV show.I do understand why it was done. I just wish they could have found a more interesting way to get those ratings. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/384719.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/384719.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 18 Nov 2008 04:49:15]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ strakallah]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>well i think its more than eye candy. i think she's a good soldier (jonas vouched for her), and she's going to be helpful in a lot of various aspects, so she adds to the show. she can help w/ missions that need an attractive woman, she can give support from the operations place (i dont know the technical name for it), and she can work w/ the wives. also we learned that she's an officer, so that also makes her more interesting/valuable. i do hope they add another guy to the show though. show them breaking him in,a nd hopefully they do more than what they did w/ brown. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/384979.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/384979.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:18:04]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ TVFanTVStop]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>Bridget (Nicole Steinwedell) has the TU fanatics deeply divided over whether she will destroy the squad.  Relax, TU maniacs.  Bridget is fresh blood, new story lines, great eye-candy, more ammunition to hook in the male viewers, and the female macho types.  The point, TU addicts, is to keep the show alive and vibrant to keep it on the air as long as possible.  Do you or don't you want your weekly TU fix.  If yes, roll with Bridget.  Give her a chance to prove she is worthy to call herself "one of the guys of The Unit."LOL Nicole. <img src="/forum/images/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" />James </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/399319.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/399319.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 22 Nov 2008 08:17:57]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ jasrh]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>*sigh*(Posted by Huggsnok in the spoiler thread, copied and pasted by me): <font color='blue'>Whats going to happen next? Tiffy is asked by Coloner Ryan to recruit her daughter, and some of her friends to start the Teenage Delta Force club? And Kim and Bob's baby was actually turned into a super ninja cyborg during the operation, and will be joining the actual unit for missions requiring a baby with the power of the hulk? Sheesh.. get a grip screenplay writer guy! EDIT: I forgot to mention it turns out that Molly actually has telepathic powers and can speak with aliens from another universe. Oh, did i mention that Colonel Ryan feels lonely in one episode, and gets a mysterious dog named Lassie who will also be joining the unit in a future episode. </font>I guess Huggsnok's ideas are okay, too?  Just asking. <a href="http://s66.photobucket.com/albums - h270/auburnhead/emoticons/?action=view& - urrent=zcoffeeandpaper.gif" target="_blank"><img src="http://i66.photobucket.com/albums/h270/auburnhead/emoticons/zcoffeeandpaper.gif"  ></a></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/399491.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/399491.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:13:09]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ auburnhead33]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>auburnhead33 wrote: </cite>*sigh*(Posted by Huggsnok in the spoiler thread, copied and pasted by me): <font color='blue'>Whats going to happen next? Tiffy is asked by Coloner Ryan to recruit her daughter, and some of her friends to start the Teenage Delta Force club? And Kim and Bob's baby was actually turned into a super ninja cyborg during the operation, and will be joining the actual unit for missions requiring a baby with the power of the hulk? Sheesh.. get a grip screenplay writer guy! EDIT: I forgot to mention it turns out that Molly actually has telepathic powers and can speak with aliens from another universe. Oh, did i mention that Colonel Ryan feels lonely in one episode, and gets a mysterious dog named Lassie who will also be joining the unit in a future episode. </font>I guess Huggsnok's ideas are okay, too?  Just asking. <a href="http://s66.photobucket.com/albums - h270/auburnhead/emoticons/?action=view& - urrent=zcoffeeandpaper.gif" target="_blank"><img src="http://i66.photobucket.com/albums/h270/auburnhead/emoticons/zcoffeeandpaper.gif"  ></a></div>		</blockquote>Or, how about Tiffy or Molly getting preggers and anguishing over what to do about it.  That will surely be "more ammunition to hook" another whole group of viewers.  To just plop the Bridget Sullivan character into the show makes about as much sense as having a mysterious dog named Lassie on the show. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/399622.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/399622.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:11:27]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ mxmartinifan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>They need Kara Thrace 'starbuck' (Katee Sackoff) from battlestar galactica. A real lady that can kick serious butt. <img src="/forum/images/smilies/b2eb59423fbf5fa39342041237025880.gif"  /> It would make more sense if Bridget is a spy of some sort, gathers intelligence for the Unit. Branch another story of her other than the Unit's action. In other words, in another sub-branch of the Unit. Of course that's just my point of view.  I believe one day there'll be female in special ops. What's wrong with a lady kicking some butt anyway!!As long as there's Jonas, Bob, Mack, Charles and Kim (original unit members of the show), that's all matters. I always think about Kim in the 'Red Clover' dream on 'Sub-Conscious'. It's so cool to see her in action!!! <img src="/forum/images/smilies/97ada74b88049a6d50a6ed40898a03d7.gif" /> CBS should create a 'SWAT' tv drama similar to the Unit; Or whatever non-special op unit. And put Kim (Andrey Maria Anderson) in it! <img src="/forum/images/smilies/69934afc394145350659cd7add244ca9.gif" /> Sorry for the little off-topic at the end. <img src="/forum/images/smilies/8a80c6485cd926be453217d59a84a888.gif" /></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/405657.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/405657.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:14:20]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ ksalanpang]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>I have no problem with the actress, but I don't trust her character and I don't like that she is part of the Unit. She should be at the base not in the field. She is still a woman and the men may put thier lives in danger even more for her. She is a distraction too. I think she is gong to turn out to be a homewrecker somehow. But thats just my opinion. They shold have kept Hector </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/405770.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/405770.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:54:32]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ AFwife81]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><span style="font-size: 18px; line-height: normal;"><font color='black'>Kara Thrace was believable because she was basically a man in a woman's body.  The part was written for a man.  She did everything men do: fight, talk sh*t, kill, f*cked anybody she felt like, drank men under the table, commanded other pilots, stressed out, etc.  I loved that show (Battle Star Gallactica).  That's how they should have made redcap, in another better actress.  Just make her be like, "WTF?"  Then start kicking azz.  She might get beat up but she will fight your azz.  She also was not the model type: not extra skinny & not Barbie doll faced.  She looked like a real person.  ShiningHorse </font></span></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/405991.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/405991.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:04:22]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ shininghorse]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>ksalanpang wrote: </cite>They need Kara Thrace 'starbuck' (Katee Sackoff) from battlestar galactica. A real lady that can kick serious butt. <img src="/forum/images/smilies/b2eb59423fbf5fa39342041237025880.gif"  /> It would make more sense if Bridget is a spy of some sort, gathers intelligence for the Unit. Branch another story of her other than the Unit's action. In other words, in another sub-branch of the Unit. Of course that's just my point of view.  I believe one day there'll be female in special ops. What's wrong with a lady kicking some butt anyway!!As long as there's Jonas, Bob, Mack, Charles and Kim (original unit members of the show), that's all matters. I always think about Kim in the 'Red Clover' dream on 'Sub-Conscious'. It's so cool to see her in action!!! <img src="/forum/images/smilies/97ada74b88049a6d50a6ed40898a03d7.gif" /> CBS should create a 'SWAT' tv drama similar to the Unit; Or whatever non-special op unit. And put Kim (Andrey Maria Anderson) in it! <img src="/forum/images/smilies/69934afc394145350659cd7add244ca9.gif" /> Sorry for the little off-topic at the end. <img src="/forum/images/smilies/8a80c6485cd926be453217d59a84a888.gif" /></div>		</blockquote>they have one. its called flashpoint. its excellent. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/406920.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/406920.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:21:40]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ TVFanTVStop]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>canadian stuff i heard. American one would be better with more locations and scenario. But yea I'll check it out when I have time..Prolly X'mas <img src="/forum/images/smilies/69934afc394145350659cd7add244ca9.gif" /></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/407011.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/407011.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:56:00]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ ksalanpang]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>yeah its in canada, but they're not killing polar bears, and kicking in igloo crackhouses or something haha. its actually done really well. the FIRST episode is by far the poorest of all of them, so dont judge the show by that episode. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/407021.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/407021.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:58:00]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ TVFanTVStop]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>I think red cap distracts me quite a bit when I see her with the Unit. She's too attractive for me to be in action. She doesn't talk tough like guys. Also, Big 'NO' to her make-up and appealing clothes at times. It's not a beauty contest. her role has to be explained clearly rather just 'jump-in' and roll with the Unit. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/411762.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/411762.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 26 Nov 2008 13:59:49]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ ksalanpang]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>they're not gonna have some fugly broad for the role though. i don't think she has to talk tough. i think she's proved she's smart, and quick on her feet. i wanna see her OUT on missions, and kicking some ass, and saving some of the fellas. makes her more believable. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/412554.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/412554.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 26 Nov 2008 19:08:43]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ TVFanTVStop]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>mxmartinifan wrote: </cite>[quote=auburnhead33 - *sigh*(Posted by Huggsnok in the spoiler thread, copied and pasted by me): <font color='blue'>Whats going to happen next? Tiffy is asked by Coloner Ryan to recruit her daughter, and some of her friends to start the Teenage Delta Force club? And Kim and Bob's baby was actually turned into a super ninja cyborg during the operation, and will be joining the actual unit for missions requiring a baby with the power of the hulk? Sheesh.. get a grip screenplay writer guy! EDIT: I forgot to mention it turns out that Molly actually has telepathic powers and can speak with aliens from another universe. Oh, did i mention that Colonel Ryan feels lonely in one episode, and gets a mysterious dog named Lassie who will also be joining the unit in a future episode. </font>I guess Huggsnok's ideas are okay, too?  Just asking. <a href="http://s66.photobucket.com/albums - h270/auburnhead/emoticons/?action=view& - urrent=zcoffeeandpaper.gif" target="_blank"><img src="http://i66.photobucket.com/albums/h270/auburnhead/emoticons/zcoffeeandpaper.gif"  ></a></div>		</blockquote>Or, how about Tiffy or Molly getting preggers and anguishing over what to do about it.  That will surely be "more ammunition to hook" another whole group of viewers.  To just plop the Bridget Sullivan character into the show makes about as much sense as having a mysterious dog named Lassie on the show. </div>		</blockquote>Oh hai thur! I got quoted! :O *Ego boost*No, but seriously. Those ideas werent exactly serious, and rather sarcastic <img src="/forum/images/smilies/69934afc394145350659cd7add244ca9.gif" /> Just in case anyone would get the idea they are actually serious ideas. And to add a bit to this discussion.They have the WIFES doing secret undercover work befitting of that of an FBI agent perhaps. (Since I believe CIA is not allowed to operate on american soil.) Without any proper training and what not, and you all go nuts over Red Cap? I mean.. come on <img src="/forum/images/smilies/69934afc394145350659cd7add244ca9.gif" /></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/413831.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/413831.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 27 Nov 2008 11:40:34]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ huggsnok]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>Huggsnok wrote: </cite>WIFES </div>		</blockquote>WIFES should be WIVES <img src="/forum/images/smilies/8a80c6485cd926be453217d59a84a888.gif" /> If we're (as in you) are going to discount their importance, let's get the correct pronunciation. <img src="/forum/images/smilies/8a80c6485cd926be453217d59a84a888.gif" /><img src="/forum/images/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" />Nyn </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/413901.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/413901.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 27 Nov 2008 12:26:55]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ nynaevelan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>Huggsnok wrote: </cite>They have the WIFES doing secret undercover work befitting of that of an FBI agent perhaps. (Since I believe CIA is not allowed to operate on american soil.) Without any proper training and what not, and you all go nuts over Red Cap? I mean.. come on </div>		</blockquote>A good many of us were not happy about the addition of Red Cap, nor were we happy about the wives being recruited to go on "missions."  There is not much we can do about it though but complain.  Even that won't do any good as TPTB made up their mind about this change for Season 4 long before the first episode hit the airwaves.  And we are stuck with it now. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/414155.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/414155.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 27 Nov 2008 16:01:36]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ knightsgrace]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>nynaevelan wrote: </cite><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>Huggsnok wrote: </cite>WIFES </div>		</blockquote>WIFES should be WIVES <img src="/forum/images/smilies/8a80c6485cd926be453217d59a84a888.gif" /> If we're (as in you) are going to discount their importance, let's get the correct pronunciation. <img src="/forum/images/smilies/8a80c6485cd926be453217d59a84a888.gif" /><img src="/forum/images/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" />Nyn </div>		</blockquote>Ah, was wondering about which one to use, but okies, now I know ^^ </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/414778.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/414778.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 28 Nov 2008 01:46:36]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ huggsnok]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>knightsgrace wrote: </cite><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>Huggsnok wrote: </cite>They have the WIFES doing secret undercover work befitting of that of an FBI agent perhaps. (Since I believe CIA is not allowed to operate on american soil.) Without any proper training and what not, and you all go nuts over Red Cap? I mean.. come on </div>		</blockquote>A good many of us were not happy about the addition of Red Cap, nor were we happy about the wives being recruited to go on "missions."  There is not much we can do about it though but complain.  Even that won't do any good as TPTB made up their mind about this change for Season 4 long before the first episode hit the airwaves.  And we are stuck with it now. </div>		</blockquote>Perhaps, but the character Red Cap makes more sense being on missions than the wives do. Considering she is some sort of military after all. And right now she is not doing much in the ways of mission, she is more back in mission control than anything, atleast the last episode she was. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/414780.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/414780.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 28 Nov 2008 01:48:52]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ huggsnok]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>she needs to talk with more intensity. I finally realized she talks like the hosts on food network. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/414813.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/414813.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 28 Nov 2008 02:27:13]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ ksalanpang]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>I know we are stuck with her so the option of not having Bridget on the show at all is not there.  But I am not sure whether I would like to see her be kick*** tough or be "soft" like she is being portrayed now.  It was just a really bad idea to add a female character the way they did.  It just makes TU seem "off" somehow. <img src="/forum/images/smilies/c30b4198e0907b23b8246bdd52aa1c3c.gif" /></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/415259.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/415259.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 28 Nov 2008 12:38:07]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ knightsgrace]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>i dont like the new girl!!! the idea was to bring in some more skin? well i dont like her the role doesnt suit her! </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/424661.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/424661.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 2 Dec 2008 05:28:11]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Cherryfinck]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>Oh, I agree with the statement she is all wrong. Intro to the show was a really poor choice. I think they might lead to something more dark, like the fact she is a CIA plant. If anyone has watched this show, they would know that there is always a twist in the logic. But who knows, maybe they are trying to broaden the viewing market for women. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/441963.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/441963.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 8 Dec 2008 02:36:43]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ corkybored32]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>She was a horrible addition to the show.  She does not belong.  There are no, I repeat, "NO" women in Special Ops, and there is a reason for that.  Kick her off the show, and stick to the facts.  This is the best Military show EVER, and CBS is ruining it with all this daytime soap junk.  Stick to the Military plots, stay away from sappy soapy characters, get back to the UNIT!!! </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/444902.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/444902.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 9 Dec 2008 10:33:03]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ A1ASHOOTER]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>My husband and I are fans of The Unit.  My understanding is that casting a woman as an operator was to increase female interest in the show.  Well, hello, but if women aren't already interested in Patrick, Haysbert, Martini, Irby and Foley, I doubt if she'll do much for them.  This is a smart show, and I'm afraid that adding a female to the close-knit group of male operators will do nothing but make this like every other show on tv.  Weak.  Why screw with something that works?  It's not that Steinwedell is a bad actress, she's just not needed on this show.  Her presence will ruin the dynamics that exist among the team members. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/502845.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/502845.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:56:14]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ unitrulz]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>unitrulz wrote: </cite>Well, hello, but if women aren't already interested in Patrick, Haysbert, Martini, Irby and Foley, I doubt if she'll do much for them. </div>		</blockquote><img src="/forum/images/smilies/283a16da79f3aa23fe1025c96295f04f.gif" /><img src="/forum/images/smilies/ed515dbff23a0ee3241dcc0a601c9ed6.gif" /><img src="/forum/images/smilies/283a16da79f3aa23fe1025c96295f04f.gif" /><img src="/forum/images/smilies/ed515dbff23a0ee3241dcc0a601c9ed6.gif" /></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/502866.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/502866.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 4 Jan 2009 19:07:03]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ nynaevelan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>I wish TBTB understood that Unit fans are not their usual dimwitted bunch of horny teenagers who who wont watch a show without a generous portion of T&A. When this show was believable and realistic, it was the best thing on TV. Now it's in danger of becoming a military soap opera.Lose the silly runway model (who, by the way, looks as convincing firing a weapon as I do ballet dancing), and get back to what made the Unit awesome. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/504441.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/504441.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 5 Jan 2009 14:35:10]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ colorscream]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>unitrulz wrote: </cite>Well, hello, but if women aren't already interested in Patrick, Haysbert, Martini, Irby and Foley, I doubt if she'll do much for them. </div>		</blockquote>...hehehe...I'm with you on that...Max Martini was all it took to get me hooked on The Unit!!! <img src="/forum/images/smilies/ed515dbff23a0ee3241dcc0a601c9ed6.gif" />What's not to love about this droolicious man!!! <a href="http://s66.photobucket.com/albums - h270/auburnhead/?action=view&current=ma - sredhairebaypic.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i66.photobucket.com/albums/h270/auburnhead/maxsredhairebaypic.jpg"  ></a></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/505132.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/505132.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:07:32]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ auburnhead33]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>knightsgrace wrote: </cite>I know we are stuck with her so the option of not having Bridget on the show at all is not there.  But I am not sure whether I would like to see her be kick*** tough or be "soft" like she is being portrayed now.  It was just a really bad idea to add a female character the way they did.  It just makes TU seem "off" somehow. <img src="/forum/images/smilies/c30b4198e0907b23b8246bdd52aa1c3c.gif" /></div>		</blockquote>Yep, looks like we are stuck with her.  This from Spoilertv.blogspot.com: <font color='green'> - I'm wondering if Nicole Steinwedell is returning to The Unit? Her character, Bridget Sullivan, seemed interesting in the first half of this season. — NickMICKEY: I had a great-great-great aunt named Bridget Sullivan who lived in Limerick, Ireland, and once danced burlesque for Churchill. She disappeared in the early 1930s when an affair with the local butcher went awry. (Or at least that's the story I heard.) As far as I know, she was not in the CIA. The Unit's Bridget, on the other hand, isn't going anywhere. Look for her role on the team to become more important as this season continues on. </font></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/526097.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/526097.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:53:03]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ earlaluvsmax]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>It's difficult to find her a role if we don't even see her weekly. Give her something to do if she's in the show!@! Don't waste her character..Ask Ron Cheals to teach her shoot first! Then we can talk <img src="/forum/images/smilies/283a16da79f3aa23fe1025c96295f04f.gif" />If mack is 6'0 even. Then is Nicole 6'1 or 2?She's not just an ordinary girl <img src="/forum/images/smilies/69934afc394145350659cd7add244ca9.gif" /></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/526119.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/526119.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:00:20]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ ksalanpang]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>ksalanpang wrote: </cite>If Mack is 6'0 even. Then is Nicole 6'1 or 2? </div>		</blockquote>From realitytvlounge in an interview with TV Guide Nicole said she is 5' 11".  Here is the article: <font color='blue'>TVGuide.com: You cut your teeth on Dawson's Creek. How has it been seeing some of your former cast mates go on to do the things they have done?Steinwedell: Oh, it's been interesting. That was my first job in Hollywood and I had watched Dawson's Creek in high school, so it was sort of surreal. Joshua [Jackson] was incredibly sweet to me, and very helpful one educating me on how to work with things. I was so new, it was ridiculous--I was such a dork! And it was so great because he's super-tall. I'm 5' 11", so I didn't feel like I had to crouch down and be petite. I could stand up next to him and flirt to my heart's content! [Laughs] </font></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/526634.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/526634.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:17:41]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ earlaluvsmax]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>probably she was wearing heels then. she appeared to be slightly taller than mack. <img src="/forum/images/smilies/69934afc394145350659cd7add244ca9.gif" /></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/526678.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/526678.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:32:33]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ ksalanpang]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>She looked taller than Mack in Dancing Lessons.  I was surprised when I read she was only 5' 11". </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/526802.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/526802.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:13:59]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ earlaluvsmax]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>I dont like her at all. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/527539.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/527539.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 15 Jan 2009 03:55:52]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ dan_turner]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>i like her when she's not in action. she pushed like a girl <img src="/forum/images/smilies/97ada74b88049a6d50a6ed40898a03d7.gif" /><img src="/forum/images/smilies/97ada74b88049a6d50a6ed40898a03d7.gif" /><img src="/forum/images/smilies/97ada74b88049a6d50a6ed40898a03d7.gif" /></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/527931.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/527931.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:13:14]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ ksalanpang]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>boy, considering all the very upleasant things said about her, (giraffe? come on, that's vitriolic) i wonder how Nicole feels about continuing on the show.  She'd have to be a good actor to read these threads and then go on and act like everyone likes her.   just a thought, since i'm sure she's a real person somewhere in the world that is not TVland. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/528801.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/528801.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:42:14]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ wendek]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>she'll need to beg the writers to write something about her, like personal life, little more history...Did she ever hang out with the guys after the mission??? We're missing a lot of things about her. She's not getting enough screen time and all. Someone has to make her more likable in the show <img src="/forum/images/smilies/283a16da79f3aa23fe1025c96295f04f.gif" /></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/528827.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/528827.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:55:17]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ ksalanpang]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>i don't recall her hangin' wit da boys after a mission.  How many episodes have there been with red cap in it? </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/528858.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/528858.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:04:43]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ wendek]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>10 episodes according to IMDB. I only see her in real action in just one episode. And you know which one. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/528971.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/528971.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:03:08]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ ksalanpang]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><span style="font-size: 18px; line-height: normal;"><font color='black'>She may never have found that post calling her a giraffe until now.  Giraffes seem like very peaceful animals.  It may be to late to change her persona without a drastic change.  She could become some sort of trainer.  I say hook her up with Beau from BRAVO and make her a wife.  Let her pop out a baby or 2 and hook her up to hang out with Tiffy.  She seems more Tiffy's speed than Kim or Molly. <img src="/forum/images/smilies/b2eb59423fbf5fa39342041237025880.gif"  />   I think they wanted a greater glamorous kickbutt chick type role for her and it just did not work the way they wrote it.  That would have worked if they then pulled her as a wife into the missions since she is specially trained.ShiningHorse </font></span></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/529610.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/529610.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 15 Jan 2009 22:38:11]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ shininghorse]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><span style="font-size: 18px; line-height: normal;"><font color='black'>WWW.dictionary.com VITRIOL?  Wendek are you a liar err... I mean a lawyer?  That's court language.   Nobody has to try to sound smarter than anybody else here.  We are all here to talk about the UNIT. <img src="/forum/images/smilies/b2eb59423fbf5fa39342041237025880.gif"  /><img src="/forum/images/smilies/283a16da79f3aa23fe1025c96295f04f.gif" /></font></span></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/529628.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/529628.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 15 Jan 2009 22:42:37]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ shininghorse]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>i dunno, not trying to sound smarter than anyone else here and just want to chat about The Unit, too, even if i have an opposing view to some, if that's ok?    i guess hearing her called a giraffe, i didn't get the idea it was because she was likened to a peaceful animal... that's all. <img src="/forum/images/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" /> i do like your idea of perhaps hooking her up with Beau and having her work close to home with the wives, if they must keep her on (probably to fulfill their contract with her at least).   I don't see her as very 'kickbutt' but i guess she can be glamorous with the undercover wife missions, since that's the direction the writers are taking this show. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/530099.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/530099.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 16 Jan 2009 01:57:24]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ wendek]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>The Unit does not need this character - the series is not "Charlie's Angels"; it's a drama set in real war times.  From her first episode it was apparent this character did not fit.  The wives are enough of a female presence and do add to the whole life of these special troops.  Sorry, but they could eliiminate this character and nothing would be missed.  Just my opinion..... </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/533237.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/533237.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 17 Jan 2009 10:00:20]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Sanz123]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>wolflady123 wrote: </cite><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>leolion811 wrote: </cite>Do - s anyone know where Nicole is originally from? I know she is from a military family and I grew up with the Steinwedells and that Bob Steinwedell is in the military.  Wonder if she could be his daughter? It would be a small world!! I believe Bob moved to Texas and he remarried years ago and I know he has children. Thanks!! <img src="/forum/images/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" /></div>		</blockquote> Who cares ? Sorry but adding her to the series is terrible, There are NO WOMEN in any Special forces and her interview was garbage . Bridgette needs an early demise or The Unit loses all its credibility <img src="/forum/images/smilies/1069449046bcd664c21db15b1dfedaee.gif"  />  I'm a woman viewer and resent TPTB trying to rewrite the series to become a typical soap opera and although I'll be watching the premiere I'll be the first nitpicking it apart too <img src="/forum/images/smilies/1069449046bcd664c21db15b1dfedaee.gif"  /> Not a fan of her bring on the series and find it all total crap ! </div>		</blockquote>I'm going to have to agree with you here.  This whole premise is preposterous.  It's like when they lower the requirements to be a firefighter just because the applicant is a woman.  The standard is set for a reason.  If she can't do the job, someone dies! <b>Red Cap is just eye candy for those with short attention spans and small penises </b>.  I believe this watering down started when they changed the theme from the first season to what we have now.  I don't like the new theme because it doesn't reflect Special Forces or the military. <b>And BTW, SHE NEVER PAID HER SPECIAL FORCES DUES!!! </b>  She doesn't belong!!!  Throw her off!!!  Have her die in some op gone wrong.  Unless she's a mole???  That's the only way she should be written into the script. <b>God Bless the United States of America! </b></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/538823.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/538823.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:14:07]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Jonnylee373]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>Jonnylee373 , does the time of your clock mean something? for this show maybe? <img src="/forum/images/smilies/69934afc394145350659cd7add244ca9.gif" /></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/538891.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/538891.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:46:06]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ ksalanpang]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>ksalanpang wrote: </cite>Jonnylee373 , does the time of your clock mean something? for this show maybe? <img src="/forum/images/smilies/69934afc394145350659cd7add244ca9.gif" /></div>		</blockquote>What do you think?  I live for The Unit, and now I'm training like I will be in The Unit.  What really pisses me off is the writers' strike.  We have to miss TU because they didn't get enough to pay for the new Jag.  Be happy with a COLA you greedy bastards! </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/538899.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/538899.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:52:44]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Jonnylee373]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>I agree too though. Pretty girl. But just not quite right for the part.  Not sure if it is the female thing though, but the point that it discredits 'The Unit'... it takes something away.  Still LOVE the show though.. I am addicted.. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/546691.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/546691.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:27:53]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ DutchessFla]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>Jonnylee373 wrote: </cite><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>ksalanpang wrote: </cite>Jo - nylee373 , does the time of your clock mean something? for this show maybe? <img src="/forum/images/smilies/69934afc394145350659cd7add244ca9.gif" /></div>		</blockquote>What do you think?  I live for The Unit, and now I'm training like I will be in The Unit.  What really pisses me off is the writers' strike.  We have to miss TU because they didn't get enough to pay for the new Jag.  Be happy with a COLA you greedy bastards! </div>		</blockquote>Uh Jonny...I'm sorry to have to tell you this but the writers strike ended almost a year ago. And the writers who most benefitted from it were the ones who DON'T drive Jags. <img src="/forum/images/smilies/2786c5c8e1a8be796fb2f726cca5a0fe.gif" /> Back to Nicole: I'm interested to see how her charcter is going to be shown with the significance I keep reading she will have in future episodes. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/547836.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/547836.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 23 Jan 2009 20:00:29]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ roobaby45]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>nicole's role has to be more sophisticate. I doubt that half of the fans know why she's in Jonas' team. I'm one of them. I only know she's good at seducing arm dealers/terrorists, wearing pretty bikinis/dresses. That's what we saw in the show. Oh and she was annoying in 'Sex Trade'. I think Bob told Red Cap to shut up when Jonas was standing and feeling guilty about not getting back the Ukrainian chicks + using them as part of a trade.Yes i think she's kind of smart. she was able to set up diversion when she's under attack in the hut as seen in 'Sacrifice'. She got some MacGyver genes maybe? Where's her swiss knife?! She violated the military protocol and risked national security just to get the Alpha team/Betsy/Col. Ryan out of Syria (Into Hell part II)?? Bold move, she got guts!!! Even Kayla wouldn't make that call.Okay that's about it. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/548119.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/548119.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:44:29]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ ksalanpang]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>K:I nominate you her #1 fan, that comes with all the requisite honors!! <img src="/forum/images/smilies/283a16da79f3aa23fe1025c96295f04f.gif" /><img src="/forum/images/smilies/8a80c6485cd926be453217d59a84a888.gif" />Nyn </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/548163.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/548163.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:58:50]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ nynaevelan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>nynaevelan wrote: </cite>K:I nominate you her #1 fan, that comes with all the requisite honors!! <img src="/forum/images/smilies/283a16da79f3aa23fe1025c96295f04f.gif" /><img src="/forum/images/smilies/8a80c6485cd926be453217d59a84a888.gif" />Nyn </div>		</blockquote><img src="/forum/images/smilies/97ada74b88049a6d50a6ed40898a03d7.gif" /><img src="/forum/images/smilies/97ada74b88049a6d50a6ed40898a03d7.gif" /><img src="/forum/images/smilies/385970365b8ed7503b4294502a458efa.gif" /><img src="/forum/images/smilies/385970365b8ed7503b4294502a458efa.gif" /><img src="/forum/images/smilies/97ada74b88049a6d50a6ed40898a03d7.gif" /><img src="/forum/images/smilies/ed515dbff23a0ee3241dcc0a601c9ed6.gif" /></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/548277.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/548277.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 23 Jan 2009 22:28:19]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ roobaby45]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>nynaevelan wrote: </cite>K:I nominate you her #1 fan, that comes with all the requisite honors!! <img src="/forum/images/smilies/283a16da79f3aa23fe1025c96295f04f.gif" /><img src="/forum/images/smilies/8a80c6485cd926be453217d59a84a888.gif" />Nyn </div>		</blockquote><img src="/forum/images/smilies/e8a506dc4ad763aca51bec4ca7dc8560.gif" /><img src="/forum/images/smilies/e8a506dc4ad763aca51bec4ca7dc8560.gif" /><img src="/forum/images/smilies/e8a506dc4ad763aca51bec4ca7dc8560.gif" /><img src="/forum/images/smilies/499fd50bc713bfcdf2ab5a23c00c2d62.gif" /><img src="/forum/images/smilies/499fd50bc713bfcdf2ab5a23c00c2d62.gif" /><img src="/forum/images/smilies/499fd50bc713bfcdf2ab5a23c00c2d62.gif" /> I'm flattered <img src="/forum/images/smilies/97ada74b88049a6d50a6ed40898a03d7.gif" />  well at least I don't discriminate woman in the Unit!! (though I don't feel like having her in jonas' team <img src="/forum/images/smilies/2786c5c8e1a8be796fb2f726cca5a0fe.gif" /> ) Yea, she also kissed Dennis a couple times in 'Bad Beat' (Don't be jealous now <img src="/forum/images/smilies/69934afc394145350659cd7add244ca9.gif" /><img src="/forum/images/smilies/69934afc394145350659cd7add244ca9.gif" /> ). That makes her know how to play undercover!!! +1!! <img src="/forum/images/smilies/97ada74b88049a6d50a6ed40898a03d7.gif" /><img src="/forum/images/smilies/97ada74b88049a6d50a6ed40898a03d7.gif" /></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/548339.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/548339.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 23 Jan 2009 22:45:40]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ ksalanpang]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>ksalanpang wrote: </cite>Yea, she also kissed Dennis a couple times in 'Bad Beat' (Don't be jealous now <img src="/forum/images/smilies/69934afc394145350659cd7add244ca9.gif" /><img src="/forum/images/smilies/69934afc394145350659cd7add244ca9.gif" /> ). That makes her know how to play undercover!!! +1!! <img src="/forum/images/smilies/97ada74b88049a6d50a6ed40898a03d7.gif" /><img src="/forum/images/smilies/97ada74b88049a6d50a6ed40898a03d7.gif" /></div>		</blockquote>She only kissed him lightly on the cheek, which is the only thing keeping me from traveling to LA to kick her non-shootin booty. <img src="/forum/images/smilies/1069449046bcd664c21db15b1dfedaee.gif"  />Just kidding <img src="/forum/images/smilies/97ada74b88049a6d50a6ed40898a03d7.gif" /><img src="/forum/images/smilies/97ada74b88049a6d50a6ed40898a03d7.gif" />Nyn </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/548396.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/548396.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 23 Jan 2009 23:01:44]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ nynaevelan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="/forum/images/smilies/c30b4198e0907b23b8246bdd52aa1c3c.gif" /> just don't like the girl not good material, horrible in this series, Michelle Rodriguz, katie Sattathe, these are girls who could play the part and add something new to the unit that would be good. It was so bad i quit watching the unit. Thought they got rid of her and then she's back, which was a horrible episode </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/548413.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/548413.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 23 Jan 2009 23:06:56]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ shadow143op]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>shadow143op wrote: </cite><img src="/forum/images/smilies/c30b4198e0907b23b8246bdd52aa1c3c.gif" /> just don't like the girl not good material, horrible in this series, Michelle Rodriguz, katie Sattathe, these are girls who could play the part and add something new to the unit that would be good. It was so bad i quit watching the unit. Thought they got rid of her and then she's back, which was a horrible episode </div>		</blockquote>You stopped watching The Unit because of one cast member you didn't like? I can't imagine that. There are SO MANY good characters and actors on this show that one doesn't spoil the show for me.  Keep watching. It's a great show even if you don't like one person. <img src="/forum/images/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" /></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/548883.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/548883.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 24 Jan 2009 07:23:14]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ roobaby45]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>red cap was not even in all of the episodes in season 4. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/549130.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/549130.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 24 Jan 2009 10:16:06]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ ksalanpang]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>Good grief, she has only been in like three episodes and she played a necessary person in all of them.  No there are not any female operators in the USSOC, but she is not playing the roll of an operator, she is in the support staff like the lady Kayla in the command center with the Coloniel.  Have a little faith and let the writers do there thing and see how it turns out. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/553555.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/553555.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:31:58]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ gamanda212]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="/forum/images/smilies/e78feac27fa924c4d0ad6cf5819f3554.gif" />I agree too, she does not belong!! the show is and has lost all creditablity. The end of last season and this season is like the hindinburg, Going down in Flames! My wife gives me greif about it because SHE THINKS they have made the wives over step their rolls in the show too.The writing is on the walls, the show has been pushed back out of prime time and airs on sundays, use to follow NCIS on Tues. which use to be my faviorite nite, now football has screwed up the times too,  by running over, not going to go there now, This show use to represent the special forces, NOW it is as said earlier, a nite time soap. <img src="/forum/images/smilies/e78feac27fa924c4d0ad6cf5819f3554.gif" /><img src="/forum/images/smilies/e78feac27fa924c4d0ad6cf5819f3554.gif" /></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/564530.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/564530.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:31:51]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ asfmcm2]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><font color='black'><span style="font-size: 18px; line-height: normal;">But it is still The Unit with our favorite actors and I'm going to watch it no matter what.  But would like to see a few more special forces ops because they are really intriguing and edge of your seat with action.  I like that. </span></font></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/564582.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/564582.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:45:24]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ earlaluvsmax]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>this season is progressing very very slowly..andgamanda212  said it already. Red Cap isn't even a field operator. You see her in undercover missions but not in those hardcore covert missions. I think there's a distinction between the types of missions and roles she's in. We still haven't seen her firing a SMG or anything bigger, that's a good sign! </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/564702.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/564702.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:30:55]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ ksalanpang]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>... and it's probably a good thing she hasn't shot with anything bigger than a handgun.  Hate to see what she could blow up with her eyes closed.   Even so, it would be interesting to see if they give RedCap some decent storylines so we can have more concern for her as someone mentioned in another thread. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/564826.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/564826.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:14:30]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ wendek]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>Black Thorn always welcome people like Red Cap too <img src="/forum/images/smilies/283a16da79f3aa23fe1025c96295f04f.gif" />I wonder if Blackwater (the real mercenary) takes a lot of combat contracts for people?? </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/565112.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/565112.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:46:43]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ ksalanpang]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>ok I havent started season 4 yet cause I wait for the dvds, but the reason I was attracted to the show was the realistic aspect of it. Formerly serving in the Army myself, especially serving in the infantry its easy to spot the innaccuracies but for the most part its realistic. I recently heard they brought a women on to the unit and I think it is absolutely absurd. NO women in combat arms PERIOD. the fact that they even interviewed her makes me laugh. they would have read her app. saw female and thrown it away in a heart beat! the fact that they moved it this way says they want to pick up women viewers but seriously they lost major credit and it really does piss me off. In the infantry the men would have nothing to do with a women if she were there and I mean NOTHING. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/590162.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/590162.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 8 Feb 2009 15:39:27]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ drawttam]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>draw,Red Cap is NOT in the unit itself and has not been in any combat scenes. She works for the DOD with the unit. Whatever she said in her interview, I would take with a grain of salt. She is more often than not in a support position. Hope that helps ease your mind a little. <img src="/forum/images/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" />Any may I add: THANKS for serving our country and making me proud to be American on your side. <img src="/forum/images/smilies/283a16da79f3aa23fe1025c96295f04f.gif" />Roo </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/590281.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/590281.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:36:33]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ roobaby45]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>drawttam wrote: </cite> NO women in combat arms PERIOD.  In the infantry the men would have nothing to do with a women if she were there and I mean NOTHING. </div>		</blockquote><b><font color='black'>Okay, I find those 2 statements interesting.  Women are trained to fight and may be placed in a combat zone. Right?  What do you mean the infantry men would have nothing to do with a woman in their unit or whatever?  They would have to intereact and work together.  Right?  Please explain your comments for us non-military people.  And, what does infantry do?  I think I know but I want to make sure.  Thanks.Edited part:  I'm not advocating for Redcap.  Everybody here knows I would never do that for her. <img src="/forum/images/smilies/283a16da79f3aa23fe1025c96295f04f.gif" />  I just want to clarify your statements.ShiningHorse </font></b></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/590371.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/590371.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 8 Feb 2009 17:23:16]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ shininghorse]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><blockquote>			<div>				<cite>ShiningHorse wrote: </cite><b><font color='black'> - Edited part:  I'm not advocating for Redcap.  Everybody here knows I would never do that for her. <img src="/forum/images/smilies/283a16da79f3aa23fe1025c96295f04f.gif" />  I just want to clarify your statements.ShiningHorse </font></b></div>		</blockquote><img src="/forum/images/smilies/97ada74b88049a6d50a6ed40898a03d7.gif" /><img src="/forum/images/smilies/97ada74b88049a6d50a6ed40898a03d7.gif" /></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/590422.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/590422.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 8 Feb 2009 17:40:14]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ nynaevelan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>well the infantry is basically the front lines in a combat zone. every soldier has an MOS which is the job they choose when in the military. women are not allowed to be in the infantry or any form of combat arms. thats the army's rules. combat arms is anyform of direct combat relations, going out into a battle ect. when women go through basic combat training they are taught how to survive and react in a combat zone just as any new recruit is. the difference is men have the job option of after basic going to infantry school and learning the ins and outs of warfare, weaponry and so forth. the infantry is just a stepping stone for other jobs in combat arms like the rangers or special operations. the unit is based off of delta force which is the most elite special forces unit. so women would not even be allowed to apply unless it was a logistical support position. the reason men in the infantry dont care for women to be in combat arms is because alot of them feel it puts the lives of other men at risk. when there is women in a unit these days and that unit is caught in a firefight or a combat situation, the mission automatically changes and the orders are now to get the women out of the line of fire. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/590482.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/590482.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 8 Feb 2009 18:08:03]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ drawttam]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><span style="font-size: 18px; line-height: normal;"><font color='black'>Okay, I think I get it.   The men would start "protecting" the female(s) instead of fighting the battle.  Well, another lady mentioned that and I also feel that way.  I also don't like the idea of women mixing with the men on that level.  I wouldn't mind learning how to fight, handle and shoot a weapon though.  It's always good for women & teens to know how to fight and protect themselves.  I know a lot of people may not agree with that statement but, when I think about all the atrocities happening in those warring African nations and the women and children being abused and forced into slavery... I think, "Why don't she cut that man's dayum throat while he sleeps, poison his azz or do worse to him?"   Pick up a gun and shoot back , raise a militia or do something.  I could think of a lot of things to do.   I know, it's cold but war is hell and it's the women and children that suffer the most.   Take a look around at war torn nations and see how they suffer from lack of education.   They can barely feed themselves let alone scratch out a living.   Education is not just book smarts.    It's not good to keep females ignorant so a man can be king. <img src="/forum/images/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" />  But I'm just a girl, what do I know. <img src="/forum/images/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" />   Okay, I'm done with that and glad I don't have to worry about learning how to shoot or fight.   I know I am going to get a "reputation" for this post, but it's true.Thanks for the explanation.  Can't wait for the next episode. <img src="/forum/images/smilies/ed515dbff23a0ee3241dcc0a601c9ed6.gif" />  ShiningHorse </font></span></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/592943.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/592943.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 9 Feb 2009 16:42:54]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ shininghorse]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><span style="font-size: 18px; line-height: normal;"><font color='black'><img src="/forum/images/smilies/2786c5c8e1a8be796fb2f726cca5a0fe.gif" />  Well, I guess I better add that I do not advocate violence. <img src="/forum/images/smilies/385970365b8ed7503b4294502a458efa.gif" />I don't want to scare people with my comments. <img src="/forum/images/smilies/136dd33cba83140c7ce38db096d05aed.gif" />   But this a show about war and bad things happen in warring areas. <img src="/forum/images/smilies/2786c5c8e1a8be796fb2f726cca5a0fe.gif" />ShiningHorse </font></span></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/594328.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/594328.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 9 Feb 2009 22:54:08]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ shininghorse]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>Who cares?  She shouldn't even be on the show at all.  Women are not part of the unit.  It's bullshit. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/634613.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/634613.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 23 Feb 2009 00:45:31]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ trouble2127]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>Good character, I say keep her. For those not in the know, there are women at one of those outfits. I know it hurts some's feelings to think women can get the job done too, but it's reality. Oh, and the Israelis have used women for years at some outfits knowing men on the teams will support them to assure mission accomplishment. </p><p>Cheers, </p><p>Oldfritz sends. </p><p></p><p>p.s. Plus, Ms. Steinwedell is easy on the eyes... KEEP HER <img alt="" src="/forum/images/smilies/97ada74b88049a6d50a6ed40898a03d7.gif" /></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/658646.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/658646.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 3 Mar 2009 03:29:43]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ oldfritz]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>I watched the 'hero' episode again. I finally heard Red Cap's official title: Warrant Officer Bridget Sullivan. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/690527.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/690527.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:27:23]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ ksalanpang]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><span class="postbody" id="previewMessage"><blockquote><div><cit><b>wolflady123 wrote: </b><p></p><blockquote><div><cite>leolion811 wrote: </cite>Does anyone know where Nicole is originally from? I know she is from a military family and I grew up with the Steinwedells and that Bob Steinwedell is in the military.  Wonder if she could be his daughter? It would be a small world!! I believe Bob moved to Texas and he remarried years ago and I know he has children. Thanks!! <img src="/forum/images/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" alt="" /></div></blockquote> Who cares ? Sorry but adding her to the series is terrible, There are NO WOMEN in any Special forces and her interview was garbage . Bridgette needs an early demise or The Unit loses all its credibility <img src="/forum/images/smilies/1069449046bcd664c21db15b1dfedaee.gif" alt="" />  I'm a woman viewer and resent TPTB trying to rewrite the series to become a typical soap opera and although I'll be watching the premiere I'll be the first nitpicking it apart too <img src="/forum/images/smilies/1069449046bcd664c21db15b1dfedaee.gif" alt="" /> Not a fan of her bring on the series and find it all total crap ! <p></p></cit></div></blockquote></span></p><p></p><p><span class="postbody" id="previewMessage">&quot;There are NO WOMEN in any Special forces&quot; </span> That is possibly an incorrect statement, The Unit is modeled after the SFOD-Dor Delta Force within SFOD-D there is rumored to be a &quot;funny platoon&quot; this platoon has civilian contractors with specialized skills and even women. So yes they are assigned to and considered Special Forces. Dont believe me google SFOD-DFunny Platoon or Delta Force Funny Platoon, although the information is vague and unconfirmed its there. Someone has stated that JSOC(Joint Special Operations Command) has confirmed this. Ihave found no evidence of this confirmation. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/719028.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/719028.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 21 Mar 2009 14:55:58]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MossadsKampf]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>Bridget isn'ta shooter, she's not 'in' The Unit (i.e. not an operator) - Col Ryan just said he could use her. When she said she had 'all the merit badges', it was a sarcastic boy scout reference - she wasn't saying she's Ranger tabbed etc. </p><p><span style="color: #ffffff">. </span></p><p>She works in intelligence, no problem with that <img alt="" src="/forum/images/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" /></p><p><span style="color: #ffffff">. </span></p><p>Ben </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/720485.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/720485.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 22 Mar 2009 04:34:29]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ b_blanco7]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>I really think she is really good for the show. And you are wrong there are women in the militiary now a days so the lady that said she needs to be killed off needs to suck it up and get over it. It is still a god show weather she was on the show or not she is doing a fantastic job. And besides there are women in the American and Canadian armed forces and military and the do fine we are in 2009 not in the 60's or 70's when women were not aloud in the military and now they have the same right as men so get over it and just watch the show. She is really good on the show so suck it up. If you don't like her on the show and say they should take her off why in the hell are you still watching the show for. Me and my husband think she does really good on the show and she and the team are blending well togther and really working well togther. We says she stays and last a long time on The Unit. We really love the show and watch it every Sunday. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/745672.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/745672.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:40:59]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ karat2008]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><span class="postbody" id="previewMessage"><blockquote><div><cit><b>karat2008 wrote: </b><p>I really think she is really good for the show. And you are wrong there are women in the militiary now a days so the lady that said she needs to be killed off needs to suck it up and get over it. It is still a god show weather she was on the show or not she is doing a fantastic job. And besides there are women in the American and Canadian armed forces and military and the do fine we are in 2009 not in the 60's or 70's when women were not aloud in the military and now they have the same right as men so get over it and just watch the show. She is really good on the show so suck it up. If you don't like her on the show and say they should take her off why in the hell are you still watching the show for. Me and my husband think she does really good on the show and she and the team are blending well togther and really working well togther. We says she stays and last a long time on The Unit. We really love the show and watch it every Sunday. </p></cit></div></blockquote><br /></span><img src="/forum/images/smilies/e8a506dc4ad763aca51bec4ca7dc8560.gif" alt="" /><img src="/forum/images/smilies/e8a506dc4ad763aca51bec4ca7dc8560.gif" alt="" /> well said and welcome guys <img src="/forum/images/smilies/283a16da79f3aa23fe1025c96295f04f.gif" /></p><p></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/747218.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/747218.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:13:36]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ ksalanpang]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><span style="font-size: larger">I think what most of you are failing to realize is that there are no women in this unit that go on missions. There is absolutely no point in her being on the show and I'll be glad when she's gone. There was already technically a women in the unit. I can't think of her name but she has been on the show since day one helping to coordinate things. If any women were going to be brought to the forefront and focused on it should have been her. She's paid her dues already. </span></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/749346.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/749346.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 31 Mar 2009 02:27:08]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ nisha413]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>Nisha, what you and others fail to realize, through no fault of your own, is that there are women at certain US military units who provide tactical support of varying kinds down range. That is what this character does and I think it's a good thing this is depicted. </p><p></p><p>I do agree though, it would be nice for a little more character development of the lady ops NCO. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Oldfritz sends. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/751226.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/751226.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:14:21]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ oldfritz]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>Definity a fan, Now. Nicole is a babe. Love the tough act. She needs a webite. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/751314.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/751314.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:35:46]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ pc177]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p></p><div><blockquote><p><cit></cit>There are NO WOMEN in any Special forces and her interview was garbage . Bridgette needs an early demise or The Unit loses all its credibility <img alt="" src="/forum/images/smilies/1069449046bcd664c21db15b1dfedaee.gif" /> I'm a woman viewer and resent TPTB trying to rewrite the series to become a typical soap opera and although I'll be watching the premiere I'll be the first nitpicking it apart too <img alt="" src="/forum/images/smilies/1069449046bcd664c21db15b1dfedaee.gif" /> Not a fan of her bring on the series and find it all total crap ! </p></blockquote><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt">You clearly have absolutely no firsthand knowledge of the military. You are confusing the heck out of your military terms, something no one with military service would do. Furthermore, women do serve in the &quot;Special Operations Units&quot; these days, though to my knowledge only in supporting roles. Those supporting roles can quickly become front line combat roles if things go badly, and they often do in the real world. All of which is consitent with the show, if you were paying attention. </p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt">The show is not about &ldquo;The Special Forces&rdquo;. It has NOTHING to do with Special Forces. It does have to do with a fictional Special Operations Unit called &ldquo;The Unit&rdquo; which is loosely based on Delta Force. While there are undoubtedly members of Delta Force that previously served in the Army Special Forces, many did not. Many were Airborne or Rangers or both, but not Special Forces. Confused yet? Most civilians are, and they throw around the terms Special Forces, Airborne, Ranger and so on as if they are universal terms when they are not. How you use them matters. If you use them incorrectly, which you are doing big time...you soundlike you have noclue what you are talkingabout...and everything you say will be ignored by those who do. </p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt">Special Forces is a specific organization within the Army. The Rangers is a different organization. The Airborne is yet another different organization. Delta Force is yet another organization, but is not technically called Delta Force, that is a nickname. All of them are Army Special Operations organizations. So the term you should have used when making your argument was Special Operations, and not Special Forces. FYI, when they show the sign at the fictional Army Base that says Special Forces Command, they are NOT referring to The Unit, but rather a different Special Forces Operations Unitassigned to the same base...which admitadly confuses people even more. Having a huge sign on the base that tells the world they are their would be counter productive...their existance is supposed to be classified. From what I read in the book, Inside Delta Force, the real Delta Force shares a base with other Special Operations Units in order to share resources. </p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt">It is possible for a Soldier to serve in one or more of Special Operations Unit throughout their career. Some soldiers even qualify to wear an Airborne and/or a Ranger tab without actually serving with an Airborne or Ranger unit beyond completing those schools and completing the minimum requirements to wear those &ldquo;tabs&rdquo;. Even more confusing, not all Army Rangers are in the Army and not all Navy Seals are in the Navy. Those organizations both have units within them that recruit from the other services. They also have schools they run which are open to the other services special operations units. So you will see Air Force Combat Controllers and Pararescue Men with Airborne and Ranger Tabs and Army Sodliers with Navy Seal jump wings and tridents and so on and so forth. The branch of service you are can get a little blurry when enter the world of special operations. </p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt">Special Operations could refer to a wide variety of units in each of the military branches, the Special Forces is a specific unit in the Army. This show is NOT about them at all. Many Special Operations Units do have women in them. I served in such a unit during the Clinton era. They typically serve in a supporting role, in a supporting unit&hellip;but those units are just as much Special Operations as Delta Force or the Seals. Twenty years ago they never would have been allowed to serve in such a unit. However, the rule against women in combat has become increasing blurred, if not outright ignored in recent years. Do women serve in Delta Force? Probably not but that unit is so secretive that you would never know if they did. In twenty years maybe somebody will write about how a woman or several women did. To pretend you know whether or not they do, is ridiculous. If you had inside knowledge into Delta Force, you would not be posting it here. </p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt">That said, when I first read about them adding a female character to The Unit I thought it was ridiculous. However, if you watch the show she provides logistics and support in the field, rather than being &ldquo;a shooter&rdquo;. Her role is more intel than shooter...and that is very realistic. She deploys, and occasionally is required to defend herself&hellip;but she hangs back when the rest of the team goes in for the kill. There is some degree of realism there even if it does seems like a stretch. Technically she&rsquo;s is not a member of The Unit. She is &ldquo;on loan&rdquo; from the Department of Defense, where she presumably works for the Defense Intelligence Agency (they did not specifically say). That too adds a degree of realism. If the mission required a woman for cover, that or the Central Intelligence Agency is probably where they would find a woman with the necessary qualifications. </p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt">If they were trying to pass her off as a Shooter, I would share your complaints. But that is not what they are doing at all. So her character has more credibility than a first glance would leave one to believe. </p>A long explination to be sure. But since so many people screw this one up, and since it is extremely annoying..it merits it. </div><p><br /></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/777484.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/777484.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 7 Apr 2009 22:34:17]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ tacticalcity]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>I hope she stays. She's attractive, she's intelligent, she's professional and certainly is no nonsense. She gives the show another dimension. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/795033.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/795033.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 13 Apr 2009 00:23:57]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ mgrifftx]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p><span id="previewMessage" class="postbody"><p><blockquote><div><cit></cit><b>oldfritz wrote: </b><p>Nisha, what you and others fail to realize, through no fault of your own, is that there are women at certain US military units who provide tactical support of varying kinds down range. That is what this character does and I think it's a good thing this is depicted. </p><p></p><p>I do agree though, it would be nice for a little more character development of the lady ops NCO. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Oldfritz sends. </p></div></blockquote></p></span><span id="previewMessage" class="postbody"><font size="2" face="Verdana"><p>Agreed/seconded. I found this description of the &quot;warrant officer&quot; rank online: </p><p>[Begin quote]: WO1s are basic level, technically and tactically focused officers who perform the primary duties of technical leader, trainer, operator, manager, maintainer, sustainer, and advisor. They also perform any other branch-related duties assigned to them. They also provide direction, guidance, resources, assistance, and supervision necessary for subordinates to perform their duties. WO1s have specific responsibility for accomplishing the missions and tasks assigned to them and, if assigned as a commander, the collective or organizational responsibility for how well their command performs its mission. WO1s primarily support levels of operations from team or detachment through battalion, requiring interaction with all soldier cohorts and primary staff. They provide leader development, mentorship, and counsel to enlisted soldiers and NCOs. [End quote] </p><p>That is entirely consistent with Red Cap's function with respect to the rest of the team - and so far, she seems to have properly fulfilled the duties of her position. It would be weirder if there wasn't someone in her position - because then, who would do those things and be a consistent support of the overall objective of the Unit? </p></font></span></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/844729.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/844729.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:04:09]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ lawyerchik1]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>hua <span class="name">tacticalcity - thanks for the explanation - although long! I thought that I was going to have to explain about SOC here but thanks to you I only have to type this short thank you. Thank you sir... </span></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/846164.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/846164.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 24 Apr 2009 22:20:27]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ bob8486]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p></p><blockquote><div><cit></cit><b>lawyerchik1 wrote: </b><span class="postbody" id="previewMessage"><p></p></span><span class="postbody" id="previewMessage"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><p>That is entirely consistent with Red Cap's function with respect to the rest of the team - and so far, she seems to have properly fulfilled the duties of her position. It would be weirder if there wasn't someone in her position - because then, who would do those things and be a consistent support of the overall objective of the Unit? </p><p></p><p></p><p><br /></p><p></p><p>Agreed/seconded. I found this description of the &quot;warrant officer&quot; rank online: </p><p></p></font></span></div></blockquote><p>Interestingly enough, as a Warrant Officer 1 (WO-1) Red Cap actually outranks Sergeant Major Jonas Blane. Likewise, Red Cap and Jonas are both outranked by 2nd Lieutenant Betsy Blane. However, it would be extremely foolish of either lady to presume to give the Top orders relative to an operational mission. You may also find it interesting that senior NCO's usually make more money than WO-1. As a result, the Navy has discontinued the rank of WO1 and only has CWO2-5 among their ranks. The Air Force discontinued all Warrant Officer ratings in 1957. </p><p>Warrant Officer 1 is an officer who is appointed by the Secretary of the relevant service (i.e. Army, Navy) and serves via &quot;warrant&quot; rather than &quot;commission&quot;. However, Chief Warrant Officers (CWO-2-5) are granted commissions by the President and take the same oath as regular &quot;commissioned officers&quot;. However, even a CWO-5 is outranked by the any commissioned officer (i.e. even a lowly 2nd Lt.). </p><p>Historically, warrant officer ratings were based on the structure of the British Royal Navy which allowed for non officers to perform the function of officers based on a warrant (which was more like an honorary officer). At that time (circa 1775) there was a distinct difference separating Officers from Warrant Officers. Commissioned Officers were &quot;Officers and Gentlemen&quot;. Warrant Officers, being able to be appointed from the &quot;lower classes&quot; were not granted the title of &quot;Gentleman&quot; as part of their Warrant. The issue of &quot;Officer and Gentlewoman&quot; did not exist at that time. </p><p>Warrant ratings are usually a single path technical expert type of position. Many Army helicopter pilots are Warrant Officers and they are ususally very experienced and damn good. To give one specific example, a chap named Mike Durant was the pilot of Blackhawk Super Six Four, which was one of two Blackhawks shot down during the Battle of Mogidishu in 1993. He and his co-pilot were both Chief Warrant Officers from the 160th SOAR (Special Operations Aviation Regiment). BTW, two D-boys were awarded the Medal of Honor postumously for their valiant defense of the crew of Super Six Four. </p><p>As has been pointed out, while Warrant Officers typically serve as advisers or specialists, they can and do command units or provide support in the field. Intelligence and Battle Field prep are two functions where women almost certainly play some part in real military operations. Their primary roles are not those of &quot;shooters&quot; but that doesn't mean that they can't shoot. It also doesn't mean that they are comic book heroines, like GI Jane. Like their male colleagues, they are serious dedicated professionals doing a difficult and dangerous job. </p><p>Of course the writers have been deliberately vague about Red Cap's previous command, not wanting to be tied down too much by reality. There are also references to working for/with DoD. I really love that one since all military departments, except the Coast Guard, are a part of the DoD. The Unified Commanders report directly to the Secretary of Defense and do not report to the Joint Chiefs of Staff or the Secretaries of Army, Navy, or Air Force on issues regarding operations (e.g. Gen Colin Powell was not Gen Norman Schwartzkopf's boss). </p><p>So, all military departments are part of DoD. However, the Unit members refer to DoD like it is a different organization, and in a bureaucratic sense it really is. However, they are so intermingled it's impossible to adequately describe the relationship unless you work in it. BTW, the Director of the DIA (Defense Intelligence Agency) is an active duty Lieutenant General and approximately 35% of DIA employees are active duty military. </p><p>So, how did Red Cap wind up working with/for DoD (DIA)? There are a small number of WO MOS (Military Occupational Specialty) that might apply to her circumstances. MOS 180A is a Special Forces WO, however that's not open to women, so we can rule it out. Most probable (pure speculation actually) is MOS 351L ( CounterIntelligence Techinican ). These soldiers can engage in actual intelligence collection operations and combat experience is a plus but not required. They may also represent the Army in investigations/operations with DOD, DOJ, or other Federal, State or Local agencies. </p><p>Personally, I don't care that much for Red Cap as a character, but the program has at least kept her activities reasonably realistic, IMO. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/849448.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/849448.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 25 Apr 2009 18:31:13]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ sniper483]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>Sniper, your second to last paragraph is on the right track. Most WOs (with the exception of the aviators), are promoted from the enlisted ranks (typically experienced and proficient NCOs), and there are lady CI and HUMINT specialists in the Army. Typically, when one refers to someone working for DOD, the implication is that they are at the department or agency level and not working directly for one of the service branches. </p><p></p><p>But, after seeing how the storyline with Whiplash is developing, I unfortunately predict Red Cap is short lived. Pure speculation on my part, but I predict that Whiplash is deep cover to infiltrate the bad guys. My guess is only COL Ryan and maybe Snake Doctor know. That would explain the tension in the closing scene in the team bar between Snake Doctor, Cool Breeze, and Red Cap a few episodes ago- Snake Doctor knows they just pulled a fake rape attempt on Red Cap,who has become a de facto member of the team, and it's a horribly shitty thing to do to a valued team member to accomplish the mission. I predict when the truth comes out, it will lead to her leaving the unit. Note, Ms. Steinwedell is still credited as a guest star. I hope I'm wrong b/c I like her character better than Whiplash, but...my two cents. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Oldfritz sends. </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/857835.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/857835.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:24:17]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ oldfritz]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:NICOLE STEINWEDELL </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>I read that Nicole is a military brat so she has probably lived in quite a few places. </p><p>I am an older female and think her character is a welcome addition to The Unit, could make for some very interesting story lines if written by someone with military saavy and experience. And by the way, for those of you who claim there are no women in U.S. special forces...wow, you need to do some serious brushing up on reality! Believe me, you are talking to the wrong people if that's what you think. The women in special forces, while relatively few, are in deep, deep, deep cover...but they are definitely out there! </p><p></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/935346.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.cbs.com/forum/posts/preList/19340/935346.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 15 May 2009 15:53:56]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ acro47]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>